"groundhog" <heraclius@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f10086a3.0410010027.49e29bdf@posting.google.com
> Some advice pls guys
>
>
> I'm using a using a pretty good studio to record music direct to CD
>
> If I then have the songs mastered
Mastering can change the sound quality of a recording. It probably should
change it.
>then replicated for CD sales - what
> are the chances of the sound quality being affected.
Depends mostly on the players you use to audition the origionals and copies
on. Some players sound better with pressed CDs than CD-Rs. In modern times
we call players that have trouble playing CD-Rs *defective* or
*substandard*.
In article <f10086a3.0410010027.49e29bdf@posting.google.com> heraclius@aol.com writes:
> I'm using a using a pretty good studio to record music direct to CD
>
> If I then have the songs mastered then replicated for CD sales - what
> are the chances of the sound quality being affected.
Mastering will almost certainly change the sound. Whether that affects
the "sound quality" is a matter of your opinion. Replication is
generally considered to be consistent and transparent, though ther are
always exceptions that some tweaker will find.
If "mastering" involves anything other than transferring data to a
glass master for replication, always listen to the "mastered" version
before the manufacturing process starts. If it doesn't sound better
than what went in, tell the mastering engineer what you don't like and
have him or her do it again.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
"groundhog" <heraclius@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f10086a3.0410010027.49e29bdf@posting.google.com...
> Some advice pls guys
>
>
> I'm using a using a pretty good studio to record music direct to CD
>
> If I then have the songs mastered then replicated for CD sales - what
> are the chances of the sound quality being affected.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Rob
In article <SXh7d.5124$nj.322@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> seriousfun@attbi.com writes:
> Mastering is simply delivering your audio in an appropriate form for
> replication. Cut and dried.
No, mastering is cutting a lacquer master which is the first step
toward making the stamper for pressing records.
But today "mastering" has a different meaning and it definitely
changes the sound because everybody wants it to.
Replication should not change the sound, but there are small
differences between pressings which can be perceived as differences by
some CD players. And of course there are differences in CD players.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.