Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Sony PCM-R500, but with 1400 hours???

Sony PCM-R500, but with 1400 hours???

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - Sony PCM-R500, but with 1400 hours???

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
Anonymous   10-06-2004 at 02:30:28 AM

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I just bought a Sony PCM-R500 on ebay and it has 1412 hours on the
heads. Has this machine about had it? The machine works perfectly at
this point.

Does anyone know what the life expectancy of DAT heads is?

I would appreciate any info in this regard, thanks,

David Smith

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
Anonymous   10-06-2004 at 07:58:40 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"David Smith" <dsmith10@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ce93b48b.0410051930.135849e5@posting.google.com...
> I just bought a Sony PCM-R500 on ebay and it has 1412 hours on the
> heads. Has this machine about had it? The machine works perfectly at
> this point.
>
> Does anyone know what the life expectancy of DAT heads is?
>
> I would appreciate any info in this regard, thanks,
>
> David Smith

If it is based on the Sony four-motor mechanism, then the claim of HHB, who
used the mechanism in their PortaDAT, may be relevant. HHB claimed that they
never had to replace heads in a PortaDAT!
This was attributed to the very finely controlled tension of the four motor
transport.
OTOH, if the transport is more typical in design, using felt clutches for
tension, then head life would be in the range of 1500 - 3000 hours.

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   10-06-2004 at 03:00:59 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

David Smith <dsmith10@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>I just bought a Sony PCM-R500 on ebay and it has 1412 hours on the
>heads. Has this machine about had it? The machine works perfectly at
>this point.

What's the error rate?

The thing about digital systems is that they work just fine until all
of a sudden they don't.

>Does anyone know what the life expectancy of DAT heads is?

It depends a lot on the machine. I've got 3,000 hours on a Tascam before
but that was probably pushing it.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   10-06-2004 at 12:26:02 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Thanks, Robert, for the good news--it does have the four-motor
transport, so I will hope for the best....
--D. Smith

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   10-07-2004 at 01:53:45 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote in message news:<ck0qab$dn9$1@panix2.panix.com>...
> David Smith <dsmith10@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> >I just bought a Sony PCM-R500 on ebay and it has 1412 hours on the
> >heads. Has this machine about had it? The machine works perfectly at
> >this point.
>
> What's the error rate?
>
> The thing about digital systems is that they work just fine until all
> of a sudden they don't.
>
> >Does anyone know what the life expectancy of DAT heads is?
>
> It depends a lot on the machine. I've got 3,000 hours on a Tascam before
> but that was probably pushing it.
> --scott


I don't know if you can check the error rate on the R500 (unlike the
R300)--there is nothing in the manual about it. I'd be happy with
3000 hours. My experience with DAT machines is that the transport
gives out before the heads.
--D Smith

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   10-07-2004 at 05:53:11 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On 6 Oct 2004 19:53:45 -0700, dsmith10@nyc.rr.com (David Smith) wrote:

>kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote in message news:<ck0qab$dn9$1@panix2.panix.com>...
>> David Smith <dsmith10@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
<snip>
>
>I don't know if you can check the error rate on the R500 (unlike the
>R300)--there is nothing in the manual about it. I'd be happy with
>3000 hours. My experience with DAT machines is that the transport
>gives out before the heads.
>--D Smith

Do a google search on sony pcm-r500 error rate and you will come up
with pages that show how to modify the remote to reveal a hidden test
button and instructions to reveal error rate.

Dave

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   10-08-2004 at 12:09:44 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"David Welp" <73133.nospmm1473@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:vpi9m0drihnkiau0l7p7mjls0nuuamgc7e@4ax.com...
> On 6 Oct 2004 19:53:45 -0700, dsmith10@nyc.rr.com (David Smith) wrote:
>
> >kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote in message
news:<ck0qab$dn9$1@panix2.panix.com>...
> >> David Smith <dsmith10@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> >I don't know if you can check the error rate on the R500 (unlike the
> >R300)--there is nothing in the manual about it. I'd be happy with
> >3000 hours. My experience with DAT machines is that the transport
> >gives out before the heads.
> >--D Smith
>
> Do a google search on sony pcm-r500 error rate and you will come up
> with pages that show how to modify the remote to reveal a hidden test
> button and instructions to reveal error rate.
>
> Dave

I can verify that this is true and the mod works.

John L Rice
Drummer@ImJohn.com

Reply to Anonymous
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Sony PCM-R500, but with 1400 hours???
Go to:

There are 839 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.260 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
How do I win badges?