We need am ICBM flight simulation !!!

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,finet.unet (More info?)

In article <55f4364e.0506140131.57ee2197@posting.google.com>,
mist_distance@hotmail.com says...
> Yes, you are the missile, carrying a 100 megaton nuke and you have to
> hit various sandnigger places like Mecca or Baghdad while avoiding
> flying carpets and killer camels !

Fine by me. As long as it comes in a dual-box version that also allows
you to hit various thick-yank places like Washington or New York while
avoiding flying cheeseburgers and killer idiot presidents !

<sigh>

Ian
--
Ian Riches
Bedford, UK

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,finet.unet (More info?)

"Tristan Beeline" <mist_distance@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55f4364e.0506140131.57ee2197@posting.google.com...
> Yes, you are the missile, carrying a 100 megaton nuke and you have to
> hit various sandnigger places like Mecca or Baghdad while avoiding
> flying carpets and killer camels !

Snap rolls! It must have snap rolls! and torpedos... yes... torpedos

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim (More info?)

"Tristan Beeline" <mist_distance@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55f4364e.0506140131.57ee2197@posting.google.com...
> Yes, you are the missile, carrying a 100 megaton nuke and you have to
> hit various sandnigger places like Mecca or Baghdad while avoiding
> flying carpets and killer camels !



Ala Dr. Strangelove !

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,finet.unet (More info?)

Ian Riches wrote:
> In article <55f4364e.0506140131.57ee2197@posting.google.com>,
> mist_distance@hotmail.com says...
>
>>Yes, you are the missile, carrying a 100 megaton nuke and you have to
>>hit various sandnigger places like Mecca or Baghdad while avoiding
>>flying carpets and killer camels !
>
>
> Fine by me. As long as it comes in a dual-box version that also allows
> you to hit various thick-yank places like Washington or New York while
> avoiding flying cheeseburgers and killer idiot presidents !
>
> <sigh>
>
> Ian

Or just perhaps, tossing a few 60 M-Tonners into London, Glasgow and
Cardiff so we could all finally get past the boredom that is life in the
UK. Tally ho, what! It's raining uranium again? Bloody hell.

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,finet.unet (More info?)

In article <zN7se.5091$eM6.4537@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au says...

<snip global thermonuclear war>

> Or just perhaps, tossing a few 60 M-Tonners into London, Glasgow and
> Cardiff so we could all finally get past the boredom that is life in the
> UK. Tally ho, what! It's raining uranium again? Bloody hell.

Nothing that a good umbrella and bowler hat couldn't handle ;-)

(and yes, I was firmly tongue in cheek in my post, as was, I more than
strongly suspect, the original).

Ian
--
Ian Riches
Bedford, UK

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim (More info?)

so i noticed

i theenk we need to tear up nips like a 70s elco again

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,finet.unet (More info?)

Persident Martinho wrote:
> and they buffeting that occurs around mach4 ees eencorrectly modeled
>
Actually, it is called 'pogo' and, yes, Free Minutemen 4.0 Unified IBeta
SP3.11 with the North Korea SuperPak doesn't model that very well. But,
they fixed the incorrect explosive bolts diameter in the texture file.

Regards,
Mr. S.

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim (More info?)

Persident Martinho wrote:
> i never notcied that im on super voodoo 3dfx sli'd to a kilo of pure
> columbian and teh rv5.602 racecar drivers and i see no difference in
> the diameter i repeat NO DIFFERENCE in they diameter

Makes sense. A note was just posted in racecar's blog: the rv5.602
drivers work best with the afghan stuff, there is a bug affecting users
of the columbian one. Hopefully, this will get fixed in the next release.

Hope this helps,
Mr. Sylvestre.

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim (More info?)

thees does not help een they slightest

thees just proves that some developers are getting keeck backs een
order to advance there prefereed manufactures at they expense of others

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim (More info?)

Persident Martinho wrote:
> thees does not help een they slightest
>
> thees just proves that some developers are getting keeck backs een
> order to advance there prefereed manufactures at they expense of others

IMHO, thees ees just a lame excuse for not investing in seerious
seemul... [damn!]

serious simulation hardware? Don't get me wrong, I do respect your right
to play Comanche and iF22 on your hardware if you are not into hardcore
sims

Mr. S.

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,finet.unet (More info?)

Ian Riches wrote:
> In article <55f4364e.0506140131.57ee2197@posting.google.com>,
> mist_distance@hotmail.com says...
>
>>Yes, you are the missile, carrying a 100 megaton nuke and you have to
>>hit various sandnigger places like Mecca or Baghdad while avoiding
>>flying carpets and killer camels !
>
>
> Fine by me. As long as it comes in a dual-box version that also allows
> you to hit various thick-yank places like Washington or New York while
> avoiding flying cheeseburgers and killer idiot presidents !
>
> <sigh>
>
> Ian

Yeah...dont hit the UK. Would be pointless to sink an American Aircraft
Carrier.