I think it would be better to place the harddrives in this way:
Channel 1: Master WD drive 1, Slave IBM drive 1
Channel 2: Master WD drive 2, Slave IBM drive 2
In this way, when accessing the WD or the IBM array, each harddisk has the full bandwidth of each channel.
The stripesize and clustersize often has a significant influence on the performance. What filesystem and clustersize are you using? The default clustersize of NTFS is 4Kb which appears to be the worse for RAID0.
In general a large stripesize is preferred if you use the drive for large files like video streaming etc. For mainstream (office, gaming etc.) a stripesize of 8-32 Kb is a common choise.
Regarding the clustersize, I dont have any rule of thumb that in general appear to apply. I suggest you try different combinations and benchmark with both large and small files.
If you dont change the stripsize, I think it is possible to reposition the drives without damaging the array. Obviosly you have to enter the RAID bios and specify the new drive locations.
<i><b>Engineering is the fine art of making what you want from things you can get</b></i>
<A HREF="http://www.btvillarin.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=655" target="_new">My systems</A>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.