RAID10 is not the same as RAID0+1.
In RAID0+1 a pair of discs are set up such that they make a RAID 0 array (Array1) and a second pair is set up as a RAID 0 array up which will mirror Array1 (Array2). If a disc in Array1 fails, then the whole of Array1 is now useless and you must restore from Array2 quickly. If a disc subsequently fails in Array2, your data is lost.
In RAID10 we first set up a pair of discs in a mirror array (Array1). Then we take a second pair of discs and set them up in a second mirror array (Array2). Then it arranged such that data is striped across the two arrays as in RAID 0. The difference is this. If a disc fails in Array 1, the second disc in Array 1 is an identical copy of the other, so the array continues to function. If a disc fails in Array 2, the same applies, and we can still funtion. Only if both discs in the same array fail simultaneously, do we loose data. Thus RAID10 is more secure than RAID0+1
In RAID0+1 a pair of discs are set up such that they make a RAID 0 array (Array1) and a second pair is set up as a RAID 0 array up which will mirror Array1 (Array2). If a disc in Array1 fails, then the whole of Array1 is now useless and you must restore from Array2 quickly. If a disc subsequently fails in Array2, your data is lost.
In RAID10 we first set up a pair of discs in a mirror array (Array1). Then we take a second pair of discs and set them up in a second mirror array (Array2). Then it arranged such that data is striped across the two arrays as in RAID 0. The difference is this. If a disc fails in Array 1, the second disc in Array 1 is an identical copy of the other, so the array continues to function. If a disc fails in Array 2, the same applies, and we can still funtion. Only if both discs in the same array fail simultaneously, do we loose data. Thus RAID10 is more secure than RAID0+1