I have a chance to buy either. Both are in great shape, price is not
an issue. I record pop/rock acts. Which board has the better pres, eq,
etc for this type of music? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks,
strat
In article <7fb55658.0411260739.3dc19b07@posting.google.com> strat65@ameritech.net writes:
> Bump
Ouch!
So which one do YOU like better? Which once is likely to be in the
best condition? Which one has all the goznitas and gozoutas that you
think you'll need for the next couple of years?
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
Thanks Mike...
I listened to these mixers 6 days apart with different playback
systems in different rooms. So the answer is... I don't know! They
both sounded good. The Makie's newer, better routing, BUT-- Trident
preamps? I've read posts elsewhere that state the VFM series boards
were horrible. Hence my asking for advice from someone that's perhaps
used both. Thanks, Mark
In article <7fb55658.0411262123.1b13c61a@posting.google.com> strat65@ameritech.net writes:
> I listened to these mixers 6 days apart with different playback
> systems in different rooms. So the answer is... I don't know! They
> both sounded good. The Makie's newer, better routing, BUT-- Trident
> preamps? I've read posts elsewhere that state the VFM series boards
> were horrible.
I'm not up on my Trident three-letter names, but I know that they made
a budget priced board that wasn't a number. In a budget board, you
don't get great preamps, you get enough gain to use microphones (which
is about all anyone ever wanted until fairly recently). If I'm not
mistaken the new Trident budget console (Dream) uses basically the VFM
preamp with an updated IC, but I could have the letters wrong.
John Oram lurks here. He'll set us straight. This is just the bait.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
strat65@ameritech.net (strat) wrote in message news:<7fb55658.0411282051.64b1fbf2@posting.google.com>...
> > John Oram lurks here. He'll set us straight. This is just the bait.
>
> Yeah! I took the bait!
VFM stands for "Value for Money" ...... yukk .. not my idea.
I designed the circuits, Malcolm did the system flow and layouts (and
the name!).
It is good value for money as the circuit topography followed my usual
Trident style so there's quite a lot of Series 80 etc in the EQ.
Parameters are good and the mic pre was good for the period. i.e.,
80's
The new Dream mic pre is quite different and similar to the S20 and
S40 new Trident rack pieces. My choice would be buy the VFM, not
because I did it, but I know the opposition and their compromises.
I did reply to this 2 days ago, but it seems to have got lost.
FWIW, I owned a VFM for about 5 years, until I switched to
location-only work. I always liked the VFM; the preamps were nothing
to rave about, but they worked, and the EQ, while a fixed 4 band
design on my model, was completely useable. (unlike many budget
console EQs). I'd recommend the VFM if for no other reason that a
couple of the better local techs were willing to work on the VFM while
they have firm NO MACKIE rules at their shops. (their explanation was
that they do not accept work on any non-modular mixers, too much work
getting to the work) When I needed work done on the VFM, I pulled a
channel strip, took it to my tech, and kept working on a 15x8 format,
until the channel came back.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.