What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
Volt? 2.0 Volt?
"Len Moskowitz" <moskowit@panix.com> wrote in message
news:cokn1q$fp6$1@panix2.panix.com
> What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
> an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
> Volt? 2.0 Volt?
Based on experience?
Consumer - 100 millivolts to 2.5 volts with a big concentration around 2.0
volts.
Audio Production - -10, 0, +4, and 6, 10 or 12 dB over them. Note mixture
of dBm and dBV.
Len Moskowitz <moskowit@panix.com> wrote:
>What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
>an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
>Volt? 2.0 Volt?
On my Prism AD-124, there are some switches in the back that you can set
the reference level. On the RME ADI-8, there is a button on the front.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
moskowit@panix.com (Len Moskowitz) wrote in message news:<cokn1q$fp6$1@panix2.panix.com>...
> What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
> an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
> Volt? 2.0 Volt?
it depends on two things; pro vs consumer and personal choice.
if you are working in a pro room then you are referencing in terms of
dbu (0dbu = .775 volts), where your meters are calibrated against
+4dbu or 1.228 volts (which equals zero vu, or mark 5 on BBC style
meter etc.). Where the reference point on your console lies in
comparison to 0dBFS is a choice that you make, and calibrate
accordingly. If your console can handle being driven hard, then you
set up so that +4dbu (1.228 volts) sits at -20dbfs...you can then
deduce (if my math is correct) that 0dbfs is =24dbu which translates
to 12.28 volts. If you have a console with a lower clip point, make
+4dbu equal something higher on the digital scale, ie. -16
perhaps...then 0dbfs is +20dbu, or 10 volts.
0 VU in consumer world is -10 dBV (note different reference - not dbu)
which equals 0.316 volts. Once again, if you reference your console to
your AD so that 0 VU is -20dbfs then 0dbfs will be 3.16 volts...yadda
yadda.
Can someone check my math and tell me if I calculated correctly?
In article <cokn1q$fp6$1@panix2.panix.com> moskowit@panix.com writes:
> What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
> an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
> Volt? 2.0 Volt?
It depends. That's why an attenuator or gain pot is nice. Typically I
set +24 dBu to 0 dBFS for live work (20 dB of headroom over +4 dBu),
but for mixing something where I have more control or I've compressed
a lot of tracks, I'll go for broke and set it to around +15 dBu (a bit
more than 10 dB of headroom over +4, pretty much like analog tape).
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
> Len Moskowitz <moskowit@panix.com> wrote:
> >What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
> >an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
> >Volt? 2.0 Volt?
>
>
If we're taking about this level of detail, don't we need to specify
if we are asking about peak to peak, or peak, or RMS?
In article <3367f36e.0412011714.566a741@posting.google.com>,
Mark <makolber@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Len Moskowitz <moskowit@panix.com> wrote:
>> >What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
>> >an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
>> >Volt? 2.0 Volt?
>
>If we're taking about this level of detail, don't we need to specify
>if we are asking about peak to peak, or peak, or RMS?
No, the dBFS scale implies peak measurement.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
"Len Moskowitz" wrote ...
> What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect
> would drive an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital?
> 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8 Volt? 2.0 Volt?
In what context? Consumer? Pro? Sub-miniature portable?
Why not 1v with a method (switch, pot, software setting, etc.)
of reducing sensitivity all the way to +8 dBm?
"Mark"
>> Len Moskowitz <
>> >What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
>> >an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
>> >Volt? 2.0 Volt?
>>
>>
>
> If we're taking about this level of detail, don't we need to specify
> if we are asking about peak to peak, or peak, or RMS?
>
** Unless otherwise specified - assume the audio voltage values are the
rms value of a sine wave.
Eg a peak VU meter will respond to the peak value of a signal - but
will be calibrated in rms sine.
"Scott Dorsey" <kludge@panix.com> wrote in message
news:colqit$k3b$1@panix2.panix.com
> In article <3367f36e.0412011714.566a741@posting.google.com>,
> Mark <makolber@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Len Moskowitz <moskowit@panix.com> wrote:
>>>> What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would
>>>> drive an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5
>>>> Volt? 1.8 Volt? 2.0 Volt?
>>
>> If we're taking about this level of detail, don't we need to specify
>> if we are asking about peak to peak, or peak, or RMS?
>
> No, the dBFS scale implies peak measurement.
I don't think so if dBFS means dB Full Scale.
For example AES standard 6id-2000 items 3.3 and 3.4 state:
3.3 full-scale input voltage
root-mean-squared (r.m.s.) input voltage level using the A-D-PC that causes
the analog-to-digital converter output to be just equal to digital full
scale, assuming the THD+N is better than - 40 dB relative to the signal
level
NOTE If the THD+N is worse than - 40 dB, then full scale is defined as the
input signal level 0,5 dB less than the level that induces - 40 dB THD+N in
the input data (see annex D.1).
3.4 full-scale output voltage
r.m.s. voltage produced using the PC-D-A while playing a 997-Hz digital
full-scale sine wave, assuming the THD+N is less than - 40 dB relative to
the signal level, with the output loaded appropriately
NOTE 1 If the THD+N is more than - 40 dB, then full scale is defined as the
output signal level 0,5 dB less than the level that induces - 40 dB THD+N in
the output data.
NOTE 2 The appropriate output load depends on the type of output. Line-level
outputs are designed for minimum loading and the load should be greater than
10 kW. Outputs designed to drive nonpowered loudspeakers should be loaded
with 8 W. Outputs designed for headphones should be loaded with 30 W.
>
>What's the amplitude of the Line level signal you'd expect would drive
>an A-to-D to 0 dBFS (full scale) digital? 1.0 Volt? 1.5 Volt? 1.8
>Volt? 2.0 Volt?
>
>
>--
>Len Moskowitz PDAudio, Binaural Mics, Cables, DPA, M-Audio
>Core Sound http://www.stealthmicrophones.com >Teaneck, New Jersey USA http://www.core-sound.com >moskowit@core-sound.com Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912
>
>
Depends on how the A/D convertor is set up. My CraneSong HEDD came factory
setup at +16dBm and my Alesis HD24 is +19dBm. Panasonic DAT machines are
22dBm.
All of the above are using balanced lines.
Consumer Gear uses 2 Volts, which is 16dB over the nominal reference level of
-10dBV.
Richard H. Kuschel
"I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.