Check out this review of the 172x. Not so flattering. They did review the 173VT which seems like the better choice for response time. Anyone know anything about it?
I believe xbit got the same 25ms engineering sample that Tom and the others did. You can tell because he thinks it is a PVA matrix. The real 172x would have a TN matrix in it.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.