Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Tube dampers in Pro Audio gear?

Tube dampers in Pro Audio gear?

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - Tube dampers in Pro Audio gear?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Anyone use Tube Dampers (eg, something like these:
http://herbiesaudiolab.home.att.net/index.htm) in their tube mic
preamps or equalizers?

I'm mostly inclined to view products like this as pure snake oil, given
that they're marketed to the same crowd who swear by $500/foot speaker
cables, exotic isolation platforms for power amps, green Sharpies for
CD edges...products whose justification is based on psuedoscience,
hearsay, expectation bias, and the sheer gall of marketing hucksters.

But then I remember that nearly every tube guitar amp I've ever owned
has gone microphonic at one time or another. So maybe Tube Dampers
aren't such a dumb idea for a Pultec...anyone?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Buster Mudd <mr_furious@mail.com> wrote:
>Anyone use Tube Dampers (eg, something like these:
>http://herbiesaudiolab.home.att.net/index.htm) in their tube mic
>preamps or equalizers?
>
>I'm mostly inclined to view products like this as pure snake oil, given
>that they're marketed to the same crowd who swear by $500/foot speaker
>cables, exotic isolation platforms for power amps, green Sharpies for
>CD edges...products whose justification is based on psuedoscience,
>hearsay, expectation bias, and the sheer gall of marketing hucksters.

For the most part, I don't think these will be very effective. But
mounting tubes out on shockmounted sockets, combined with adding some
rigidity IS very effective at reducing microphonic noise. The thing
about microphonics is that damping down the tube envelope won't do
too much because most of the noise is from the grid itself moving around.

Note that if these things do work, spring-mounted tube shields will do
basically the same thing.

>But then I remember that nearly every tube guitar amp I've ever owned
>has gone microphonic at one time or another. So maybe Tube Dampers
>aren't such a dumb idea for a Pultec...anyone?

For the most part, tubes that go microphonic are due to the mica insulation
or internal supports being damaged from the expansion and contraction, allowing
elements to start moving around inside. The best solution for this is slower
startup and shutdown. Most amps were designed when tubes were cheap and
expendable so nobody bothered with things like thermal relays for delayed
startup because they were more expensive than just changing tubes occasionally.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:16:05 -0800, Buster Mudd wrote:

> Anyone use Tube Dampers (eg, something like these:
> http://herbiesaudiolab.home.att.net/index.htm) in their tube mic
> preamps or equalizers?
>
> I'm mostly inclined to view products like this as pure snake oil, given
> that they're marketed to the same crowd who swear by $500/foot speaker
> cables, exotic isolation platforms for power amps, green Sharpies for
> CD edges...products whose justification is based on psuedoscience,
> hearsay, expectation bias, and the sheer gall of marketing hucksters.
>
> But then I remember that nearly every tube guitar amp I've ever owned
> has gone microphonic at one time or another. So maybe Tube Dampers
> aren't such a dumb idea for a Pultec...anyone?

I've seen equipment where the tube socket itself is mounted on rubber
washers. It was a tape deck, and I think they were the EF86s for the
tape head preamp. That would be more effective for stopping vibration than
attaching things to the top of the tube.

Not totally psudoscience IMHO. Even digital gear sometimes makes little
noises on the output if you hit the case....

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On 8 Dec 2004 11:16:05 -0800, "Buster Mudd" <mr_furious@mail.com>
wrote:

>Anyone use Tube Dampers (eg, something like these:
>http://herbiesaudiolab.home.att.net/index.htm) in their tube mic
>preamps or equalizers?
>
>I'm mostly inclined to view products like this as pure snake oil, given
>that they're marketed to the same crowd who swear by $500/foot speaker
>cables, exotic isolation platforms for power amps, green Sharpies for
>CD edges...products whose justification is based on psuedoscience,
>hearsay, expectation bias, and the sheer gall of marketing hucksters.
>
>But then I remember that nearly every tube guitar amp I've ever owned
>has gone microphonic at one time or another. So maybe Tube Dampers
>aren't such a dumb idea for a Pultec...anyone?

Presumably your rack gear isn't going get vibrated like a guitar amp
does. I wouldn't see a need for tube dampers unless you have your
gear sitting on top of a speaker cab.

Al

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

philicorda wrote:

> On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:16:05 -0800, Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> > Anyone use Tube Dampers (eg, something like these:
> > http://herbiesaudiolab.home.att.net/index.htm) in their tube mic
> > preamps or equalizers?
> >
> > I'm mostly inclined to view products like this as pure snake oil, given
> > that they're marketed to the same crowd who swear by $500/foot speaker
> > cables, exotic isolation platforms for power amps, green Sharpies for
> > CD edges...products whose justification is based on psuedoscience,
> > hearsay, expectation bias, and the sheer gall of marketing hucksters.
> >
> > But then I remember that nearly every tube guitar amp I've ever owned
> > has gone microphonic at one time or another. So maybe Tube Dampers
> > aren't such a dumb idea for a Pultec...anyone?
>
> I've seen equipment where the tube socket itself is mounted on rubber
> washers. It was a tape deck, and I think they were the EF86s for the
> tape head preamp. That would be more effective for stopping vibration than
> attaching things to the top of the tube.

My ancient Ferrograph has just that arrangement. Along with the screening can
with the spring retainer.


> Not totally psudoscience IMHO. Even digital gear sometimes makes little
> noises on the output if you hit the case....

I must try tapping a D-A tomorrow ! But then there'll probably be some
mechanical noise pickup from the nearby output filter. Oh well...


Graham

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On 8 Dec 2004 11:16:05 -0800, "Buster Mudd" <mr_furious@mail.com>
wrote:

>..anyone?

I've seen some of this kind (brand unknown) of thing melt
all over the tube and socket, and socket connections, and
circuit board, and...

Chris Hornbeck
"Shi mian mai fu"

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I've done a whole lot of experimentation with tube damping devices in preamps & amps, and I can
say two things about them:
1) Elastic damping rings pretty universally tighten up the bass substantially & clean up the
mids a bit, with these effects being more pronounced in power amp input/driver stages than in
preamps, but still quite extant in all cases.
2) No damping rings were more effective than the simple silicone o-rings available dirt cheap
at mcmaster.com, where they are sold for plumbing & etc. For example, on 12AX7-size tubes, I
use 1"o.d./0.75"i.d. & use two or three per tube(3 or 4 for tall ones like the 12BH7 & 6CG7).
This o-ring is about $15 for a bag of 50. Being silicone, they don't dry out or crack like
neoprenes, and don't melt all over the tube & socket like the sorbothane rings(which seem to
have thankfully disappeared from the market). And they're cheap enough that even a small
benefit potential makes it worth using them.

--
Stephen Sank, Owner & Ribbon Mic Restorer
Talking Dog Transducer Company
http://stephensank.com
5517 Carmelita Drive N.E.
Albuquerque, New Mexico [87111]
505-332-0336
Auth. Nakamichi & McIntosh servicer
Payments preferred through Paypal.com
"Buster Mudd" <mr_furious@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1102533365.889034.213640@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Anyone use Tube Dampers (eg, something like these:
> http://herbiesaudiolab.home.att.net/index.htm) in their tube mic
> preamps or equalizers?
>
> I'm mostly inclined to view products like this as pure snake oil, given
> that they're marketed to the same crowd who swear by $500/foot speaker
> cables, exotic isolation platforms for power amps, green Sharpies for
> CD edges...products whose justification is based on psuedoscience,
> hearsay, expectation bias, and the sheer gall of marketing hucksters.
>
> But then I remember that nearly every tube guitar amp I've ever owned
> has gone microphonic at one time or another. So maybe Tube Dampers
> aren't such a dumb idea for a Pultec...anyone?
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Pooh Bear <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>
>> How about mechanical feedback from speakers in the same room? I could imagine
>> if tubes were slightly microphonic and they were in the room with some large
>> speakers that there could be bass coupling going on.
>
>I guess that would introduce an error signal and make the bass sound underdamped and 'wooly' like a PA
>close to feedback. Sounds plausible. A limitation of tubes to be honest. I can't see teflon rings
>helping all that much here since it's not the glass envelope that's the direct pickup mechanism. You'd
>need to 'decouple' the entire tube from the source of vibration - hence anti-vibration sockets ! Which I
>noted I couldn't easily find using Google. So much for the tube audiophools.

Yes, I have done the rubber shockmount thing for nuvistors a lot, because
the tight spacing on them makes for more microphonic issues than most
tubes. Teflon rings wouldn't do much, but I could see hanging a large mass
on the envelope at least changing the tuning of whatever mechanical
resonances are there a little bit. Maybe not much, since most of the problem
are the grids wobbling around with respect to the cathode and plate.

The anti-vibration sockets were common in military gear, and Fair Radio
probably still stocks them somewhere. Don't let the audiophile crowd know
or there will be a rush on them.

>Much simpler to use solid state !

I am having a very bad surface mount experience today. At least when tube
gear fails, the parts have the values marked on them....
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

> I am having a very bad surface mount experience today. At least when
tube
> gear fails, the parts have the values marked on them....
> --scott
>
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Oh yeah, nothing like tring to desolder, test and replace a flat
trasistor the size of a gnat. Fun Fun Fun

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

A gnat would look like Godzilla compared to some of the new ultra-tiny SMD transistors in use
nowadays. Incidentally, there is at least one "decoder book" available for the inscrutible
numbering system on those things. I think I saw it in the Parts Express catalog, or maybe MCM.

--
Stephen Sank, Owner & Ribbon Mic Restorer
Talking Dog Transducer Company
http://stephensank.com
5517 Carmelita Drive N.E.
Albuquerque, New Mexico [87111]
505-332-0336
Auth. Nakamichi & McIntosh servicer
Payments preferred through Paypal.com
<tymish@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1102692918.665634.270560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I am having a very bad surface mount experience today. At least when
> tube
> > gear fails, the parts have the values marked on them....
> > --scott
> >
> > --
> > "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
>
> Oh yeah, nothing like tring to desolder, test and replace a flat
> trasistor the size of a gnat. Fun Fun Fun
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <cpcjvq$ogr$1@reader2.nmix.net>,
Stephen Sank <bk11@thuntek.net> wrote:
>A gnat would look like Godzilla compared to some of the new ultra-tiny SMD transistors in use
>nowadays. Incidentally, there is at least one "decoder book" available for the inscrutible
>numbering system on those things. I think I saw it in the Parts Express catalog, or maybe MCM.

The numbering on resistors isn't so bad, but I have a whole stack of boards
with tantalum decoupling caps that are just brown rectangles with no numbers
of any sort. At least I _think_ they are tantalum decoupling caps...
they are certainly failing like tantalum caps.
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Tube dampers in Pro Audio gear?
Go to:

There are 1333 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them