I almost decided about buying a Matorx RT.X100 for my video editing after reading all the reviews, but after having a discusion with one of my friend, I'm in a fix again. He discourages my buying the Matrox and throwing away that much of money. He suggests ATI AIW 9700 PRO. His points are:
- Matrox gives ADOBE Premier but I already has the software.
- I hardly needs Matrox so-called better analog capture inputs as, almost all my work involves DV video editing.
- Also, I'll have to buy a graphics card to run with Matrox, which is not the case with ATI.
- I got a TV tuner in ATI, which is not there in Matrox.
- Of course ATI is cheaper then Matrox.
The only thing which Matrox provides is real-time capturing. What exactly is this real-time capturing? And what u guys suggest me? Is Matrox RT.X100 is really worth?
Thx.
- Matrox gives ADOBE Premier but I already has the software.
- I hardly needs Matrox so-called better analog capture inputs as, almost all my work involves DV video editing.
- Also, I'll have to buy a graphics card to run with Matrox, which is not the case with ATI.
- I got a TV tuner in ATI, which is not there in Matrox.
- Of course ATI is cheaper then Matrox.
The only thing which Matrox provides is real-time capturing. What exactly is this real-time capturing? And what u guys suggest me? Is Matrox RT.X100 is really worth?
Thx.