Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > I recorded my voice in 48k nuendo project but with apogee-..

I recorded my voice in 48k nuendo project but with apogee-..

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - I recorded my voice in 48k nuendo project but with apogee-..

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I made a mistake
I recorded my voice with apogee ad sampleratesetting 44.1
but the project was 48k and I locked my audio card also 48k
and when I recorded my voice I feelt strangely that the tempo was very slow
and I found that i made a mistake like above

but I only have to down the pitch..
the tempo is now works fine...
but the pitch is more high by about less 2 semitones
I must down the pith by about the same amount (less 2 semitones)
how much should I down the pitch?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <1c7c168a.0412180417.6f90b158@posting.google.com> bluesjeon@hotmail.com writes:

> I made a mistake
> I recorded my voice with apogee ad sampleratesetting 44.1
> but the project was 48k and I locked my audio card also 48k
> and when I recorded my voice I feelt strangely that the tempo was very slow
> and I found that i made a mistake like above

There are complicated ways that you can attempt to fix this, but since
you made the recording and it's your voice, there's no issue with
unavailability of the studio or the talent. Just record it again.
That's bound to take less time than fooling with the files.

If you insist in fixing this by pitch shifting, the ratio is 44.1/48.
Get out your calculator.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

bj wrote:
> I made a mistake
> I recorded my voice with apogee ad sampleratesetting 44.1
> but the project was 48k and I locked my audio card also 48k
> and when I recorded my voice I feelt strangely that the tempo was very slow
> and I found that i made a mistake like above
>
> but I only have to down the pitch..

Or better yet, fix the headers on the WAV files. Something like <http://railjonrogut.com/HeaderInvestigator.htm> will do the trick.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On 18 Dec 2004 04:17:01 -0800, bluesjeon@hotmail.com (bj) wrote:

>I made a mistake
>I recorded my voice with apogee ad sampleratesetting 44.1
>but the project was 48k and I locked my audio card also 48k
>and when I recorded my voice I feelt strangely that the tempo was very slow
>and I found that i made a mistake like above
>
>but I only have to down the pitch..
>the tempo is now works fine...
>but the pitch is more high by about less 2 semitones
>I must down the pith by about the same amount (less 2 semitones)
>how much should I down the pitch?

by the appropriate ratio

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 04:17:01 -0800, bj wrote:

> I made a mistake
> I recorded my voice with apogee ad sampleratesetting 44.1
> but the project was 48k and I locked my audio card also 48k
> and when I recorded my voice I feelt strangely that the tempo was very slow
> and I found that i made a mistake like above
>
> but I only have to down the pitch..
> the tempo is now works fine...
> but the pitch is more high by about less 2 semitones
> I must down the pith by about the same amount (less 2 semitones)
> how much should I down the pitch?

I have a little difficulty in understanding the problem...

If you sang along to the music at 44k, I'd imagine the pitch would be
relatively correct when the project was played back at 48k, as the backing
track would have been slowed/sped up by the same amount as well. That
would explain why the tempo of the vocals is still correct.

A formant shift down without a pitch shift would then be the thing to get
the vocal sounding natural again.
If I've got the wrong end of the stick, then just ignore this post. :)

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > I recorded my voice in 48k nuendo project but with apogee-..
Go to:

There are 510 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 vianescute won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 meywd won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 nayega won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 gpfear won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Conrad925 won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 skythra won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Ckaz won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 james59 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 snarl won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 patlabor44 won the Uniformed badge