Yeah, he was. Don't know if he ever sold it or not. I do recall his
price seemed rather high, but I'm sure it was in excellent condition.
You should email him Aaron.
EricK wrote:
> Joe Sensor wrote:
>
>> Wasn't Guido selling his?
>
>
> Yeah, he was. Don't know if he ever sold it or not. I do recall his
> price seemed rather high, but I'm sure it was in excellent condition.
> You should email him Aaron.
>
Yes, it would be worth paying a bit extra to buy from someone that you
know took proper care of the machine.
Unless you know a lot more about these machines than you seem to, based
on your Studer questions, you could easily buy one that will cost you
more, even lots more, in the long run.
> I think he has a MKIII I want a II and I want to spend much-o less-o.
> Thanks though
> Aaron householter
> studio1117
>
Yeah, I think you're right. Guido has/had an MK-III. As far as I know,
and I'm by no means an expert, the difference between an MK-II and
MK-III is mainly the age and wear and tear. I don't think the MK-III
introduced a whole lot of extra functionality. I think it's just the
MK-III's are newer, and therefore are usually in better shape.
If you are aware of any difference between the two, I would love to know
for my own knowledge....thanks.
"EricK" <eric@Raw-Tracks.com> wrote in message
news:33c35mF3tq08kU1@individual.net...
> std1117@swbell.net wrote:
>
> > I think he has a MKIII I want a II and I want to spend much-o less-o.
> > Thanks though
> > Aaron householter
> > studio1117
> >
>
> Yeah, I think you're right. Guido has/had an MK-III. As far as I know,
> and I'm by no means an expert, the difference between an MK-II and
> MK-III is mainly the age and wear and tear. I don't think the MK-III
> introduced a whole lot of extra functionality. I think it's just the
> MK-III's are newer, and therefore are usually in better shape.
>
> If you are aware of any difference between the two, I would love to know
> for my own knowledge....thanks.
Mine was Mk-II and I never worked with a Mk-III, but if I understand well,
Mk-II went through a number of revisions over time (lots, indicated by
letter suffix to the serial number) - bug fixes, mods, improvements etc. At
one point they simply renamed the machine into Mk-III.
In article <cqrkod$hjc$1@ls219.htnet.hr>, Predrag Trpkov
<predrag.trpkovNeSpamu@ri.htnet.hr> wrote:
> Mine was Mk-II and I never worked with a Mk-III, but if I understand well,
> Mk-II went through a number of revisions over time (lots, indicated by
> letter suffix to the serial number) - bug fixes, mods, improvements etc. At
> one point they simply renamed the machine into Mk-III.
>
> Predrag
They also did at least 3 other things:
Moved the deck plate up a bit - a III has the deck plate raised
compared to the on-machine controls in front of it.
Otari put some nice strong metal over the 2 outer rollers for some
protection.
A III auto slows down the FF or REW speed when it notices it is getting
near the beginning or end of a reel. Very cool. The II would just spin
off madly if you weren't paying attention.
David Correia
Celebration Sound
Warren, Rhode Island
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.