Moto V3 vs. Nokia 6230

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.motorola (More info?)

Not only does Nokia have phone sync software but it is far superior to MPT
and it is FREE.
http://www.nokiausa.com/support/phones/software/

The only reason I went with the V3 is the display size and clarity. I was
tired of squinting at those tiny screens.

MG


"Fred" <agunat@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MErqe.12854$Hj.4460@lakeread02...
> Soliciting opinions on a Nokia 6230 vs. Motorola V3 Razr
>
> 1st let me say that I own the V3 and am very happy with it. I have only
> recently considered the 6230 mainly because I understand you can put a
> chip
> in it to expand it's memory capacity. Am I correct in assuming this would
> let me store many more contacts and appointments in the calendar? I would
> not need the memory for many pictures although MP3's would be nice. Does
> Nokia have a program similar to Motorola's Mobile Phone Tools? Of course
> there is THE RECEPTION QUESTION.. Does either have superior cell
> reception?
> Your opinions please.
>
> The pluses & minuses as I see them:
>
> V3 Razr
> By far the better display and form factor.
> Mobile Phone Tools Software
>
> 6230
> Expandable memory (if it will do what I want - contacts & appointment
> mostly). I would like it to do enough of each
> that I could shelve my Palm Pilot a good deal of the time.
> Much better searches in the contact list
> More information re contacts (addresses, notes, etc.)
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
> Fred
>
>