What's with all this Linux talk in RAP?

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:07:40 -0500, Bob Weston
<Weston9910_ui@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What's going on?
> Bob Weston

Someone posted to a Linux advocacy group, crossposted here, that he was
switching back to WinXP.

The intended flame war ensued.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <20041227191618.06431.00001602@mb-m26.aol.com>,
blckout420@aol.com (BLCKOUT420) wrote:

> I could care less what OS anybody uses. These freaks need to get over it.

yah, everyone knows that a Macintosh sounds better.
--
Digital Services Recording Studios
http://www.digisrvs.com

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <are.you.crazy-24876A.21404527122004@library.airnews.net> are.you.crazy@sendmenomail.com writes:

> yah, everyone knows that a Macintosh sounds better.

Particularly the vintage ones with tubes.

--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <cqsq4e$2b8$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk>,
Dan Mills <dmills@spamblock.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Blues_Jam wrote:
> >>
> >> yah, everyone knows that a Macintosh sounds better.
> >> --
> >> Digital Services Recording Studios
> >> http://www.digisrvs.com
> >
> > I think the Macintosh has a better low end sound but I prefer that nice
> > upper-midrange crunch heard when biting into the Delicious variety.
>
> But I cannot help but feel that Solaris has more sparc in the top end.
>
> Regards, Dan.
>

a Western Digital drive sure has the classic Nashville sound.
Micropolis is better for East Coast/Urban styles, imo....
--
Digital Services Recording Studios
http://www.digisrvs.com