Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Outboard EQ for monitors?

Outboard EQ for monitors?

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - Outboard EQ for monitors?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I got these Nady model 250 50/50w biamped near field monitors. They sound
very muddy to me. If I EQ down the base up to 160hz and raise up the
treble, they sound better. Problem is, I drive a 2nd pair of speakers off
the same audio output (Sound card on PC) and the JBLs sound great to my
ears(full size passive JBLs with Yamaha 100W amp.)

I got the NADYS as can be desktop and I wanted something that I location
properly to my ears and that would be nearfield.

Is there a cheap stereo EQ I can put inline with the audio to the Nadys to
knock down some of the muddyness and boost treb? If so, can you point in
the direction to buy such a thing?

Any thoughts on EQ or anything else you think might improve the situation
are appreciated.

Thanks for any tips!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <BsrBd.7275$yW5.1131@fed1read02>,
"SJMoore" <SJMoore@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I got these Nady model 250 50/50w biamped near field monitors. They sound
> very muddy to me. If I EQ down the base up to 160hz and raise up the
> treble, they sound better. Problem is, I drive a 2nd pair of speakers off
> the same audio output (Sound card on PC) and the JBLs sound great to my
> ears(full size passive JBLs with Yamaha 100W amp.)
>
> I got the NADYS as can be desktop and I wanted something that I location
> properly to my ears and that would be nearfield.
>
> Is there a cheap stereo EQ I can put inline with the audio to the Nadys to
> knock down some of the muddyness and boost treb? If so, can you point in
> the direction to buy such a thing?
>
> Any thoughts on EQ or anything else you think might improve the situation
> are appreciated.
>
> Thanks for any tips!


Just do yourself a favor and use the money you might spend on an EQ to
save up for better monitors that don't need to be EQed. Also, the
muddiness could very well be a room problem -- small rooms tend to have
bass resonance problems. Ethan Winer is the resident expert on the
acoustic treatment necessary to solve these kinds of problems.

Or, if the JBLs really sound great, just use the JBLs and ditch the Nady
speakers. Nady doesn't exactly sit at the top (or middle) of anyone's
list for monitor speakers.

As for replacements on the inexpensive (as far as monitors go) side, I
can strongly recommend the Mackie HR624s. I've had them since last
summer and still am happy to have paid $600 for a pair (slightly used).
I figure anything that costs $600 that I don't regret buying 6 months
later is a good purchase.

-Todd

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <BsrBd.7275$yW5.1131@fed1read02>, SJMoore <SJMoore@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I got these Nady model 250 50/50w biamped near field monitors. They sound
>very muddy to me. If I EQ down the base up to 160hz and raise up the
>treble, they sound better. Problem is, I drive a 2nd pair of speakers off
>the same audio output (Sound card on PC) and the JBLs sound great to my
>ears(full size passive JBLs with Yamaha 100W amp.)

So, move them farther away from the wall and farther away from the corners.
Check your room for low end problems.

>I got the NADYS as can be desktop and I wanted something that I location
>properly to my ears and that would be nearfield.

That doesn't mean they still don't need to be set up properly for the room.
I haven't heard the Nadys, and I suspect they aren't so wonderful, but even
so you should be able to do a lot of low-end tailoring by adjusting the
position in the room.

>Is there a cheap stereo EQ I can put inline with the audio to the Nadys to
>knock down some of the muddyness and boost treb? If so, can you point in
>the direction to buy such a thing?

No. Putting _more_ cheap junk into your signal path is not going to help
things, it will make it worse. If you have a setup problem, a room problem,
or a speaker problem, fix it.

If your car is missing the right front wheel, do you put sandbags in the
left side of the trunk to keep it level?
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

> Is there a cheap stereo EQ I can put inline with the audio to the Nadys to
> knock down some of the muddyness and boost treb?

Take it from someone who has been down this road and don't go
there.........don't even think of going there. You are not doing live sound.
A cheap EQ is going to likely cause phase anomalies and generally degrade
the accuracy of your reference. This won't improve your monitoring setup. I
tried this years ago with expensive 30 band graphic EQ's and also expensive
5 band parametric EQ's thinking I would try to EQ the monitors rather than
analyze and go to the trouble/expense of treating a room I knew I wouldn't
be occupying for very long. Total waste of time and money (though the EQ's
worked nicely for other applications eventually)

Educate yourself on rooom acoustics. You might want to start here:

www.ethanwiner.com

Buy or build the appropriate acoustic treatments.

Buy the best monitors you can afford and test a number of them in the
*treated* room you will be using to mix.

There's no quick and dirty fix for what you're describing that I know of.

I had been treating my spaces myself for years with increasingly positive
results but when I moved to my new room last spring, I wanted it *right* and
I didn't have the time or desire to wrestle with this any more. I brought a
consultant who had experience designing major facilities out to my place to
help me get my head around the whole thing. It was the best money I've ever
spent on my studio.

If you live in a large city, this shouldn't be too hard to accomplish and
will save you lots of time, grief and money
in the long run. Plus, you can use this knowledge forever.

Doug Joyce
Animix Productions
Durango, CO
http://www.graphicresultsofdurango [...] tudio.html


"SJMoore" <SJMoore@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:BsrBd.7275$yW5.1131@fed1read02...
> I got these Nady model 250 50/50w biamped near field monitors. They
sound
> very muddy to me. If I EQ down the base up to 160hz and raise up the
> treble, they sound better. Problem is, I drive a 2nd pair of speakers
off
> the same audio output (Sound card on PC) and the JBLs sound great to my
> ears(full size passive JBLs with Yamaha 100W amp.)
>
> I got the NADYS as can be desktop and I wanted something that I location
> properly to my ears and that would be nearfield.
>
> Is there a cheap stereo EQ I can put inline with the audio to the Nadys to
> knock down some of the muddyness and boost treb? If so, can you point in
> the direction to buy such a thing?
>
> Any thoughts on EQ or anything else you think might improve the situation
> are appreciated.
>
> Thanks for any tips!
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

>
>
>Just do yourself a favor and use the money you might spend on an EQ to
>save up for better monitors that don't need to be EQed.

Don't EQ Monitors! If they are that bad, Do as the man says and buy something
better

Also, the
>muddiness could very well be a room problem -- small rooms tend to have
>bass resonance problems. Ethan Winer is the resident expert on the
>acoustic treatment necessary to solve these kinds of problems.
>
>Or, if the JBLs really sound great, just use the JBLs and ditch the Nady
>speakers. Nady doesn't exactly sit at the top (or middle) of anyone's
>list for monitor speakers.
>
>As for replacements on the inexpensive (as far as monitors go) side, I
>can strongly recommend the Mackie HR624s. I've had them since last
>summer and still am happy to have paid $600 for a pair (slightly used).
>I figure anything that costs $600 that I don't regret buying 6 months
>later is a good purchase.
>
>-Todd
>

I listened to several sets of small monitors in the same control room for
several hours and my feeling about the Mackie 624's is a lot different than
Todd's.

There were Tannoy Reveals, Genelecs, some small pair of Fostex monitors with
funny looking woofers, Dynaudios and JBL's. I felt that the Mackies were the
least of the lot, and they weren't the lowest priced.

Your opinion may be different.

Richard H. Kuschel
"I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Outboard EQ for monitors?
Go to:

There are 1093 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them