I have a project studio which I'm moving into a location in my office
building. I have TWO options, and would like some advice if anyone is
knowledgeable about these things, please:
Option 1
1 room 11x20
Option 2:
2 rooms beside each other separated by a door:
Room A - 11x13
Room b - 11x9
Am I better to use the one LARGER room in hopes of having better sound, or
should I take the two SMALLER rooms, which gives me a BIT of isolation,
possibly at the expense of sound quality due to the smaller size?
I should mention that each of the rooms are completely parallel walled, and
have an 8 foot ceiling. This is an office building, which will be quiet at
night, but I CANNOT do much treatment in either the one room or two separate
rooms.
I will be tracking myself half the time, and other for some projects. Mostly
solo artists tracing on instrument at a time. Probably never, or very seldom
a full band.
Any advice on which way to go, and why would be greatly appreciated.
Small rooms ain't gonna hurt ya, but you're gonna want a big window to see
from one room to the other, and it must be effective, able to see everywhere
from room to room.
Iso room would need to be wired for headphone/talkback etc.
I'd go for the big room.
If you want an iso booth, you can throw one up in the corner.
Portable baffles and partitions, shipping blankets, drapes etc work well for
building iso sections for drums etc....
--
Hey Hay! The music's gettin' better all the time at www.lchb.ca
"Gavin" <gavin@interNOpromSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:GsCdnW1d15mUO3DcRVn-qw@rogers.com...
> I have a project studio which I'm moving into a location in my office
> building. I have TWO options, and would like some advice if anyone is
> knowledgeable about these things, please:
>
>
>
> Option 1
>
> 1 room 11x20
>
>
>
> Option 2:
>
> 2 rooms beside each other separated by a door:
>
> Room A - 11x13
>
> Room b - 11x9
>
>
>
> Am I better to use the one LARGER room in hopes of having better sound, or
> should I take the two SMALLER rooms, which gives me a BIT of isolation,
> possibly at the expense of sound quality due to the smaller size?
>
>
>
> I should mention that each of the rooms are completely parallel walled,
and
> have an 8 foot ceiling. This is an office building, which will be quiet at
> night, but I CANNOT do much treatment in either the one room or two
separate
> rooms.
>
>
>
> I will be tracking myself half the time, and other for some projects.
Mostly
> solo artists tracing on instrument at a time. Probably never, or very
seldom
> a full band.
>
>
>
> Any advice on which way to go, and why would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks so much,
>
>
> --
> Gavin
>
>
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:06:22 -0500, "Gavin"
<gavin@interNOpromSPAM.com> wrote:
>I have a project studio which I'm moving into a location in my office
>building. I have TWO options, and would like some advice if anyone is
>knowledgeable about these things, please:
>
>
>
>Option 1
>
>1 room 11x20
>
>
>
>Option 2:
>
>2 rooms beside each other separated by a door:
>
>Room A - 11x13
>
>Room b - 11x9
>
For proper response frequency wise, design a room with at least 1600sq
ft and non parrallel walls.
I went with @14' square rooms to start, 9' ceilings, control and live
room, with floated floors, ceilings, and non parrallel walls.
Do a google search, much is documented in this group over the years.
Mike Rivers gave me my insight when I was building my rooms back in
1995
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.