M-Audio Audiophile 2496 w/ SiS-based motherboard

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

I have a mobo with a Sis chipset on it (I think a sis 735?). Works
great with the 24/96. While the 24/96 is NOT "audiophile", I have
found it to be the most compatible soundcard I've ever worked with.
The thing just likes to work, period.

That's my experience.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On 2005-01-19, Rudence <take.du@SPAMMERZmailcity.com> wrote:

> does anyone think there would be any problems/incompatibilites with the card
> and the SiS chipset motherboard?

If there is an incompatability on your SiS board, it will be with IDE DMA.
But if you have that problem it will affect any PCI card.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On 2005-01-19, Rudence <take.du@SPAMMERZmailcity.com> wrote:


> Hello. I have the ASUS P4S533-MX motherboard which uses the SiS 651 chipset,

I know you already have a board, and that you have a 478 cpu. But if
you want a motherboard recommendation, here it is: Asus P5P800, Intel
865, LGA775 chip. It's a fanless mobo, you put a Zalman 7000 on the
CPU, and underclock it a bit, and you've got a nice quiet DAW box with
no compatability problems. Add Seagate SATA drives (ST drives are
*quiet* and *fast*), put it in an Antec Sonata case, and you've got a
hell of a good machine, as quiet as PC's of this order can be. (I
replaced one of my Shuttles with what I just described).

My comment about SiS is based on numerous bad past experiences with SiS
boards, nothing to do with the current Asus board you have. For A/V
systems, I've learned to go with Intel chipsets, since it's the only way
I've consistently avoided compatability issues.

On the other hand, I've had a bunch of Delta cards, never a problem
except trying to use one on an Epia/Mini-ITX machine that was just plain
underpowered.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"james of tucson" <fishbowl@radagast.home.conservatory.com> wrote in
message news:slrncus5rq.7tr.fishbowl@radagast.home.conservatory.com
> On 2005-01-19, genericaudioperson@hotmail.com
> <genericaudioperson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> While the 24/96 is NOT "audiophile"
>
> I wonder what you're measuring to reach that conclusion.
> Where is it weak?

Not balanced I/O, no support for +4 levels.

>The converters? The clock? What would you replace it with that would be
>better?

Audiophile 24/192, Delta 1010LT, Delta 1010

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"james of tucson" <fishbowl@radagast.home.conservatory.com> wrote in
message news:slrncutcde.7tr.fishbowl@radagast.home.conservatory.com
> On 2005-01-19, Arny Krueger <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Audiophile 24/192, Delta 1010LT, Delta 1010
>
> Ok, so you have no problem with the Envy24/ICE171x architecture, but
> with the implementation on the AP2496. Cool, thanks!

No, no problems with the AP2496, either. Just slipped from my list.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

dude, it's so obvious.

just listen to it.