Apogee Rosetta or M-Audio delta 44 and why?

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <yish313.1j3kpp@news.audiobanter.com> yish313.1j3kpp@news.audiobanter.com writes:

> what is the difference besides the price of the two sound interfaces

One is a computer interface and the other one isn't.

> and why ?

Because they were designed to do different things.

Now maybe what you really want to know is what the difference in the
A/D (and/or D/A) converters in each device. The difference is in what
design compromises had to be made to accouint for the difference in
price.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <358av0F4j39aoU1@individual.net> eric@Raw-Tracks.com writes:

> Actually, with the addition of the optional Firewire Card, the Rosetta's
> could work as a computer interface.

And with a better A/D converter, the M-Audio could work as an Apogee.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers - (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo