Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
Lauer did in fact predict that SprintPCS would be a WLNP winner, despite
Smith his childish obscenities for my saying so. And pretending he
didn't remember Lauer saying that when SMITH posted about it last fall !
http://www.rcrnews.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?newsId=15019
Is a current link
And yet SprintPCS is a WLNP loser having lost more users from
portability than it gained.
The apologists just want to insult me rather than than
admit to SprintPCS being the loser it is.
Only AT&T Wireless did worse from WLNP.
Here is The LIES:
From: Bob Smith (usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net)
Subject: Re: Sprint PCS stock is no more. All gone.
Original FormatNewsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 2004-04-24 18:45:49 PST
"Robert M." <rmarkoff@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rmarkoff-3271F4.05401824042004@news03.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <53a6bb1ffdf4a14a1f4d91cab9fd0086@news.teranews.com>,
> O/Siris <0siris@sprntpcs.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <rmarkoff-4AF364.16033323042004
> > @news04.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> > >
> > > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1293&e=4&u=/ap/20040423/
> > > ap on bi ge/sprint stock&sid=95573418
> > >
> > >
> > > If you had any stock in SprintPCS (PCS), today every share was replaced
> > > by 1/2 a share of Sprint (FON) stock.
> > >
> > > "KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Sprint Corp. on Friday recombined its wireline and
> > > wireless tracking stocks into a single common stock. "
> > >
> >
> > Wow. Something that's been announced for quite some time is
> > now news?
> >
> > We said we were going to do this, and do it exactly this way.
>
> You also said you were going to reduce churn, become profitable, and be
> a WLNP winner and none of those happened.
Pure and udder bullshit Phillipe. I don't have a clue about the quote
from Lauer on being a WNLP winner, but I specifically remember SPCS's web
presentations that said they would be profitable by 1st or 2nd quarter in
2005 ... not 2004, but 2005 ...
You are so full of it, your eyes are brown ...
Bob
=======
From: Bob Smith (usirsclt_NoSpam_@earthlink.net)
Subject: Re: Dow-Jones News report on Wireless carriers.
Original FormatNewsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 2003-09-09 10:35:23 PST
Lauer, however, downplayed those concerns, noting that Sprint's customer
turnover is near the average for the wireless industry.
"We believe we will be a smaller net winner out of this," he said. "I
don't think we'll be a large winner, I don't think we'll be a large
loser."
Bob
===================
Lauer did in fact predict that SprintPCS would be a WLNP winner, despite
Smith his childish obscenities for my saying so. And pretending he
didn't remember Lauer saying that when SMITH posted about it last fall !
http://www.rcrnews.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?newsId=15019
Is a current link
And yet SprintPCS is a WLNP loser having lost more users from
portability than it gained.
The apologists just want to insult me rather than than
admit to SprintPCS being the loser it is.
Only AT&T Wireless did worse from WLNP.
Here is The LIES:
From: Bob Smith (usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net)
Subject: Re: Sprint PCS stock is no more. All gone.
Original FormatNewsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 2004-04-24 18:45:49 PST
"Robert M." <rmarkoff@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rmarkoff-3271F4.05401824042004@news03.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <53a6bb1ffdf4a14a1f4d91cab9fd0086@news.teranews.com>,
> O/Siris <0siris@sprntpcs.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <rmarkoff-4AF364.16033323042004
> > @news04.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> > >
> > > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1293&e=4&u=/ap/20040423/
> > > ap on bi ge/sprint stock&sid=95573418
> > >
> > >
> > > If you had any stock in SprintPCS (PCS), today every share was replaced
> > > by 1/2 a share of Sprint (FON) stock.
> > >
> > > "KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Sprint Corp. on Friday recombined its wireline and
> > > wireless tracking stocks into a single common stock. "
> > >
> >
> > Wow. Something that's been announced for quite some time is
> > now news?
> >
> > We said we were going to do this, and do it exactly this way.
>
> You also said you were going to reduce churn, become profitable, and be
> a WLNP winner and none of those happened.
Pure and udder bullshit Phillipe. I don't have a clue about the quote
from Lauer on being a WNLP winner, but I specifically remember SPCS's web
presentations that said they would be profitable by 1st or 2nd quarter in
2005 ... not 2004, but 2005 ...
You are so full of it, your eyes are brown ...
Bob
=======
From: Bob Smith (usirsclt_NoSpam_@earthlink.net)
Subject: Re: Dow-Jones News report on Wireless carriers.
Original FormatNewsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 2003-09-09 10:35:23 PST
Lauer, however, downplayed those concerns, noting that Sprint's customer
turnover is near the average for the wireless industry.
"We believe we will be a smaller net winner out of this," he said. "I
don't think we'll be a large winner, I don't think we'll be a large
loser."
Bob
===================
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram