On the advice of some RAP'ers i'm getting an adcom 535II for my LS3/5A's to
use as studio monitors. After doing some research it looks like I'm going to
need a preamp as well, is this correct? If so, can anyone recommend a good
preamp to "match" the 535II or possibly a 545II? Budget is tiny (<$100 used)
Thanks!
> > After doing some research it looks like I'm going to
> > need a preamp as well, is this correct?
>
> Probably not, unless you're going to be playing vinyl.
>
Actually I will be playing SOME vinyl but I'd rather not spend $100 to play
records on my $20 turntable every so often....maybe I can rig something up
with my mic pre (RNP) and an A/B box or run it through my Mackie 1604 if
need be.
>
> > preamp to "match" the 535II or possibly a 545II?
>
> Which is it? The 535II is a much better sounding amp IMO.
Yeah, I've heard that the 535II is generally better, especially for my lower
wattage LS3/5A's (it's cheaper also)....so I will go with the 535II
"Kurt Albershardt" <kurt@nv.net> wrote in message
news:35bpvkF4iohmiU1@individual.net...
> Jonny Durango wrote:
> > On the advice of some RAP'ers i'm getting an adcom 535II for my LS3/5A's
to
> > use as studio monitors.
>
> It's a great little amp.
>
>
>
> > After doing some research it looks like I'm going to
> > need a preamp as well, is this correct?
>
> Probably not, unless you're going to be playing vinyl.
>
>
>
>
> > preamp to "match" the 535II or possibly a 545II?
>
> Which is it? The 535II is a much better sounding amp IMO.
In article <dqSdnUcajq4OLW3cRVn-sQ@comcast.com> jonnybush_from_officedurango1@comcast.net writes:
> On the advice of some RAP'ers i'm getting an adcom 535II for my LS3/5A's to
> use as studio monitors. After doing some research it looks like I'm going to
> need a preamp as well, is this correct?
No, but a class of device has emerged due to the situation making
you think you need a preamp. They're usually called "monitor
controllers" and can be as simple as a volume control in a box (with
proper input and output connectors) such as the $100 ballpark NHT and
A-Design or as sophisticated as the Crane Song Avonet for several
thousand dollars. Usually these devices include input source switching
and often switching for different monitors as well as other assorted
(to the manufacturer's tastes, dreams, and price point) goodies such
as metering, talkback, phono preamp, switching for both powered and
passive monitors, digital inputs, and so on.
If you're only able to spend $100, if a volume control is all you
need, look at the NHT or A-Designs. If you want more switching, look
at the Samson C-Control. The volume controls are fully passive and
won't do anything but change the volume. Most of the multi-function
controllers have some active circuitry in the signal path, for worse
or not-so-worse.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers - (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
"Jonny Durango" <jonnybush_from_officedurango1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BMCdnbKNJ94HIm3cRVn-hw@comcast.com...
> > > After doing some research it looks like I'm going to
> > > need a preamp as well, is this correct?
> >
> > Probably not, unless you're going to be playing vinyl.
> >
>
> Actually I will be playing SOME vinyl but I'd rather not spend $100 to
play
> records on my $20 turntable every so often....maybe I can rig something up
> with my mic pre (RNP) and an A/B box or run it through my Mackie 1604 if
> need be.
Probably not. Phono signals need to have RIAA equalization applied, which
the RNP won't do, and phono cartridges (well, moving-magnet ones) need to be
loaded by 47k, which is higher than the RNP supplies. Go buy a phono preamp,
or a hi-fi receiver, on ebay.
If your recording rig has a level control on it, though, you don't need a
preamp for your recording work.
The NHT PVC (passive volume control) is a nice little device. They do show
up on e-bay every so often - I've bought 2 of them that way. I think you
can buy them direct from NHT for $99 or so.
"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1106317773k@trad...
>
> In article <dqSdnUcajq4OLW3cRVn-sQ@comcast.com>
jonnybush_from_officedurango1@comcast.net writes:
>
> > On the advice of some RAP'ers i'm getting an adcom 535II for my LS3/5A's
to
> > use as studio monitors. After doing some research it looks like I'm
going to
> > need a preamp as well, is this correct?
>
> No, but a class of device has emerged due to the situation making
> you think you need a preamp. They're usually called "monitor
> controllers" and can be as simple as a volume control in a box (with
> proper input and output connectors) such as the $100 ballpark NHT and
> A-Design or as sophisticated as the Crane Song Avonet for several
> thousand dollars. Usually these devices include input source switching
> and often switching for different monitors as well as other assorted
> (to the manufacturer's tastes, dreams, and price point) goodies such
> as metering, talkback, phono preamp, switching for both powered and
> passive monitors, digital inputs, and so on.
>
> If you're only able to spend $100, if a volume control is all you
> need, look at the NHT or A-Designs. If you want more switching, look
> at the Samson C-Control. The volume controls are fully passive and
> won't do anything but change the volume. Most of the multi-function
> controllers have some active circuitry in the signal path, for worse
> or not-so-worse.
>
>
>
>
> --
> I'm really Mike Rivers - (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
> However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
> lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
> you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
> and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
wouldn't a passive volume control just allow you to reduce the signal,
whereas the whole point of a preamp is to boost the signal to line level? If
I want a passive volume control I'll just wire up an inline variable
resistor.
"Henri Minette" <hgminette@locklaw.com> wrote in message
news:41f18884$0$248$a1866201@visi.com...
> The NHT PVC (passive volume control) is a nice little device. They do
show
> up on e-bay every so often - I've bought 2 of them that way. I think you
> can buy them direct from NHT for $99 or so.
>
>
> "Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
> news:znr1106317773k@trad...
> >
> > In article <dqSdnUcajq4OLW3cRVn-sQ@comcast.com>
> jonnybush_from_officedurango1@comcast.net writes:
> >
> > > On the advice of some RAP'ers i'm getting an adcom 535II for my
LS3/5A's
> to
> > > use as studio monitors. After doing some research it looks like I'm
> going to
> > > need a preamp as well, is this correct?
> >
> > No, but a class of device has emerged due to the situation making
> > you think you need a preamp. They're usually called "monitor
> > controllers" and can be as simple as a volume control in a box (with
> > proper input and output connectors) such as the $100 ballpark NHT and
> > A-Design or as sophisticated as the Crane Song Avonet for several
> > thousand dollars. Usually these devices include input source switching
> > and often switching for different monitors as well as other assorted
> > (to the manufacturer's tastes, dreams, and price point) goodies such
> > as metering, talkback, phono preamp, switching for both powered and
> > passive monitors, digital inputs, and so on.
> >
> > If you're only able to spend $100, if a volume control is all you
> > need, look at the NHT or A-Designs. If you want more switching, look
> > at the Samson C-Control. The volume controls are fully passive and
> > won't do anything but change the volume. Most of the multi-function
> > controllers have some active circuitry in the signal path, for worse
> > or not-so-worse.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I'm really Mike Rivers - (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
> > However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
> > lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
> > you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
> > and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
>
>
"Jonny Durango" <jonnybush_from_officedurango1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:MOmdncKLz-r6um_cRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> wouldn't a passive volume control just allow you to reduce the signal,
> whereas the whole point of a preamp is to boost the signal to line level?
Right. Let's backtrack: for what are you using this setup? In other words,
what's feeding the 535?
"Jonny Durango" <jonnybush_from_officedurango1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:F8OdnQOag-tXUW_cRVn-rg@comcast.com...
> > Right. Let's backtrack:
>
> good call...here's what I envision
>
> Delta 66 soundcard >---|'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''|
> CD player >------------| Mackie 1604 | ---> (preamp?) > 535II > limiter >
> LS3/5A's
> Record player >--------|;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;|
>
>
> the limiter is there to protect the speakers from from my dumb ass....I
hear
> that is really easy to blow up a pair of ls3/5a's, possibly while drunk =)
Okay, but limiters work on line-level signals, not speaker-level signals, so
it should really go at the input of the 535, not the output. Unless you use
the old trick of putting a light-bulb in series with the speakers...which
you probably don't really want to do with LS3/5a's, drunk or otherwise.
As for eliminating the Mackie from the equation, yeah, do it. Folks have
mentioned a passive preamp on this thread, really just a selector switch
with a level control, and that's what I'd recommend.
> As for eliminating the Mackie from the equation, yeah, do it. Folks have
> mentioned a passive preamp on this thread, really just a selector switch
> with a level control, and that's what I'd recommend.
>
> Peace,
> Paul
I've been using an Adcom 535 and an Adcom GTP-400 for some time. The
GTP-400 is one of Adcom's lower end preamp/tuners, and has two tape
inputs as well as a CD input. Adding an Adcom GDA-600 D/A allows me to
input 4 different digital sources, output one S/PDIF digital, and one
(unbalanced - RCA) analog output that I run to the "CD" input of the
preamp/tuner.
The GDA-600 will pass 24 bits, but I think it truncates the last four
bits when it does D/A. Works fine for the application I use it for, and
total (used) cost for all 3 pieces was just over $300.
I replaced a Mackie 1201 VLZ Pro ahead of the amp, mostly because of the
physical setup of the space. (Shelfs above the work area.)
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.