I'm considering building a midgrade system around the NForce2 platform. (AMD Athlon XP 2000+ or 2100+, probably no overclocking, or very minimal.)
I read on Tom's first review of NForce2 cards at
www.tomshardware.com/mainboard/20021111/nforce2-16.html
that he strongly recommended CL2 memory. He even says "Only CL2". I didn't see any comparison graphs of CL2 benchmarks vs. other memory, however.
I've found that CL2 is 40-60% more expensive than non-CL2 memory. Given that NForce2 requires 2 DIMMs to take advantage of the dual channels, that cost winds up being even a little greater.
Is it really that important to have CL2 memory with a NForce2 motherboard? For the extra $100 or so that the CL2 memory will cost, I could buy a much faster processor (even a new Barton core). In other words, if the review took price of memory (vs. price of processor) into account, I wonder if they still would have recommended CL2 memory. The "bang for the buck" seems to side with slower memory and a faster processor. What do others think?
I read on Tom's first review of NForce2 cards at
www.tomshardware.com/mainboard/20021111/nforce2-16.html
that he strongly recommended CL2 memory. He even says "Only CL2". I didn't see any comparison graphs of CL2 benchmarks vs. other memory, however.
I've found that CL2 is 40-60% more expensive than non-CL2 memory. Given that NForce2 requires 2 DIMMs to take advantage of the dual channels, that cost winds up being even a little greater.
Is it really that important to have CL2 memory with a NForce2 motherboard? For the extra $100 or so that the CL2 memory will cost, I could buy a much faster processor (even a new Barton core). In other words, if the review took price of memory (vs. price of processor) into account, I wonder if they still would have recommended CL2 memory. The "bang for the buck" seems to side with slower memory and a faster processor. What do others think?