Best refresh under flourecent lights?

OK, so I know that low refresh rates cause eye pain. I know that 60Hz is bad in the U.S. for monitors under flourecent lighting as well, because the monitor is flashing nearly the same frequency as the lights. I also know that relatively speaking, higher frequencies cause less eye fatigue.

So the question is, which is better, 85Hz or 90Hz. I would assume 90Hz, except that it's exactly 1.5x the rate at which the lights flicker...so is 85Hz better.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>

Thanks. Hey, if you're in a European standard country, 100Hz is 2x50, so the there could be "flash" caused by the lights flashing ever other cycle of the monitor, causing eyestrain. That's what I was thinking might be the case in the U.S. using 90Hz, the monitor being synchronized with the lights every 3rd power cycle.

My only options appear to be 70Hz, 85Hz, and 90Hz.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>

from 6+ years in front of lots of moniterz I've found 75hz to be the bestest for eyes at any light conditions

..this is very useful and helpful place for information...

man, why is it so much incoming in both of us, what is it, a curse or a blessing?

..this is very useful and helpful place for information...