I'm trying to determine if I understand this-
I read the FAQ and believe it to say that ATA 133 has little advantage over ATA 100 because ATA 133 achieves its throughput advantage in data bursts, and quickly looses its advantage in sustained transfer. Right?
So, would it be safe to say that a good HDD with 8MB cache can achieve similar speeds to the ATA133- and this is perhaps another reason that ATA133 never caught on?
---There may be more than one way to do it, but why would anyone want to remove the fur from a feline?---
I read the FAQ and believe it to say that ATA 133 has little advantage over ATA 100 because ATA 133 achieves its throughput advantage in data bursts, and quickly looses its advantage in sustained transfer. Right?
So, would it be safe to say that a good HDD with 8MB cache can achieve similar speeds to the ATA133- and this is perhaps another reason that ATA133 never caught on?
---There may be more than one way to do it, but why would anyone want to remove the fur from a feline?---