Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
One of the real pluses for Sprint PCS has been one's ability to check
their usage via *4 and on the web. It had been steadily improving
through April 2004 when it seemed near real time. In May it went back to
2003 status of being hours behind, and on Memorial Day it was not
updated at all. Not minutes used, not credits issued.
Any Sprint PCS employees with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what's going on?
Have there been layoffs, and/or is this the first evidence of IBM taking
over?
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
My account is up to date.
It was within an hour or two of being up to date yesterday and Sunday as
well, for me anyway.
Maybe an glitch in your area?
Scotty
"Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.city> wrote in message
news:rmarkoff-904F15.06002901062004@news03.east.earthlink.net...
> One of the real pluses for Sprint PCS has been one's ability to check
> their usage via *4 and on the web. It had been steadily improving
> through April 2004 when it seemed near real time. In May it went back to
> 2003 status of being hours behind, and on Memorial Day it was not
> updated at all. Not minutes used, not credits issued.
>
> Any Sprint PCS employees with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what's going on?
> Have there been layoffs, and/or is this the first evidence of IBM taking
> over?
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
In article <8CZuc.21582$oh7.17279@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>,
"Scott Nelson - Wash DC" <spamcop@bnmnetworks.net> wrote:
> My account is up to date.
> It was within an hour or two of being up to date yesterday and Sunday as
> well, for me anyway.
>
> Maybe an glitch in your area?
>
> Scotty
You are only confirming what I posted. It was near real time in April, a
few hours behind in May, and not recorded at all on Monday, which you
didnt report on.
>
>
> "Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.city> wrote in message
> news:rmarkoff-904F15.06002901062004@news03.east.earthlink.net...
> > One of the real pluses for Sprint PCS has been one's ability to check
> > their usage via *4 and on the web. It had been steadily improving
> > through April 2004 when it seemed near real time. In May it went back to
> > 2003 status of being hours behind, and on Memorial Day it was not
> > updated at all. Not minutes used, not credits issued.
> >
> > Any Sprint PCS employees with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what's going on?
> > Have there been layoffs, and/or is this the first evidence of IBM taking
> > over?
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
Uh, yesterday was Monday. ;-)
Scotty
"Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.city> wrote in message
news:rmarkoff-C5C640.06243501062004@news03.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <8CZuc.21582$oh7.17279@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>,
> "Scott Nelson - Wash DC" <spamcop@bnmnetworks.net> wrote:
>
> > My account is up to date.
> > It was within an hour or two of being up to date yesterday and Sunday as
> > well, for me anyway.
> >
> > Maybe an glitch in your area?
> >
> > Scotty
>
> You are only confirming what I posted. It was near real time in April, a
> few hours behind in May, and not recorded at all on Monday, which you
> didnt report on.
>
>
> >
> >
> > "Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.city> wrote in message
> > news:rmarkoff-904F15.06002901062004@news03.east.earthlink.net...
> > > One of the real pluses for Sprint PCS has been one's ability to check
> > > their usage via *4 and on the web. It had been steadily improving
> > > through April 2004 when it seemed near real time. In May it went back
to
> > > 2003 status of being hours behind, and on Memorial Day it was not
> > > updated at all. Not minutes used, not credits issued.
> > >
> > > Any Sprint PCS employees with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what's going on?
> > > Have there been layoffs, and/or is this the first evidence of IBM
taking
> > > over?
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
"Nebby" <nebby00007@aol.compants> wrote in message
news:20040601121644.13427.00000243@mb-m04.aol.com...
> Something wierd going on. Finally, late this morning, my credits are all
> showing up ,
> BUT...
>
> (not that it matters), the web site is now showing fewer Night and Weekend
> unlimited minutes used.
Using multiple IDs to reply in the same thread again Phillipe ...? Geez, you
take the cake.
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
In article <2406-40BCF494-12@storefull-3232.bay.webtv.net>,
caperenewal@webtv.net (Eric) wrote:
> (Røbert M.) wrote:
> > We're even. I don't eat Japanese food.
>
> Is it Japanese food or Chinese food that you can eat and then be hungry
> again in 20 minutes?
In my case, I can eat anything, and then eat again 20 minutes later.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.