Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.sports (
More info?)
On Sun, 02 May 2004 19:26:12 GMT, "Kasey Chang \(remove EATSPAM to
reply\)" <kschang77@eatspamhotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"S. Delerme" <delerme@free.fr> wrote in message
>news:kf7990t5qgsoi6mki5nmgkrr268r49rclg@4ax.com...
>> What I see in american football is players who (except for the QB) are
>> supposed to exactly do what their coach tells them, and don't have to
>> think too much for themselves since every play lasts for but a few
>> seconds.
>
>In that case, you clearly do NOT understand American football
>as much as you thought you did.
>
That certainly may be the case (even though I used to watch games on a
weekly basis)
>While a general play is called, the QB and the RB's have the ability to
>change the play (to a limited extent) while the ball is still in motion.
>The
>option play is the best example... Keep and pass, or handoff and duck?
>But even in a typical passing play, the wide receivers and running backs
>have to run their routes WHILE dodging coverage, while defense could
>be playing zone or man-to-man or even double-teaming some hot
>receivers.
>
But do they decide to double-team themselves or do they just follow
the coach's decisions ?
I'm not saying it is not a sport (since in track and field, for
example, the options are even more limited), what I'm saying is that
what really awes me in team games (like basketball for example), the
ability to improvise and adjust to the general situation seems to be
lacking in most of the game (but maybe it's just because I can't
understand the subtleties)
>Even in a running play, the running back's job is hardly done when he
>gets
>through the "hole" created by the offensive line. The other backs are
>often
>trying to draw off other defenders, or provide blocking against
>defenders
>who's chasing the ball carrier, and so on.
>
>I am afraid your comments have only demonstrated your... ignorance
>of American Football.
>
It may be so