Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/ [...] nd.jsp?s=3


Has the chart where ONLY SprintPCS gets the lowest rating.

The NATIONAL ratings which for the 3rd year in a row put SprintPCS at
the bottom rung.

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <2la671F9smg8U1@uni-berlin.de>,
Blackheart <Blackheart@Darkwings.com> showed that he is:

Another Sprint apologist in denial:


Attack the messenger when you dont like the message.


J.D. Power rated SprintPCS worst. Third year in a row!

http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/ [...] nd.jsp?s=3

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

Uhmm, Look again
Alltel & T-Mobile were the worst.
Try again there sparky.




On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:18:14 GMT, "Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty>
wrote:

>http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/jdpa_ratings/wireless/Find.jsp?s=3
>
>
>Has the chart where ONLY SprintPCS gets the lowest rating.
>
>The NATIONAL ratings which for the 3rd year in a row put SprintPCS at
>the bottom rung.

UrHookUp.com, Inc.
"Come Get Hooked Up!"
www.urhookup.com

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

Just trying to start up a "controversy" again. Passes the time.
I would like the 5 minute argument please! :-)

"Foil hat" stocks are going up I hear..........

Scotty


"Scott Stephenson" <scott.stephensonson@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:U_2dnXIRTtPGhW3d4p2dnA@adelphia.com...
>
> "Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
> news:rmarkoff-40222A.05181410072004@news05.east.earthlink.net...
> > http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/ [...] nd.jsp?s=3
> >
> >
> > Has the chart where ONLY SprintPCS gets the lowest rating.
> >
> > The NATIONAL ratings which for the 3rd year in a row put SprintPCS at
> > the bottom rung.
>
> Interesting, Phil- Sprint is not rated lowest on that page. Wanna try
again?
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

Røbert M. wrote:
> http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/ [...] nd.jsp?s=3
>
>
> Has the chart where ONLY SprintPCS gets the lowest rating.
>
> The NATIONAL ratings which for the 3rd year in a row put SprintPCS at
> the bottom rung.

Isn't JD Powers the same organization that tallied up Cadillac and
Jaguar as the number two and three for all automakers in inital car
quality? I'd feel bad for the person who only relied on that for making
a decision, very deceiving unless they only planned on owning the car
for around 90 days. I don't know how to interpet those stats or compare
those findings with a cell phone customer service survey but that is
definately strange.

Not mine but worth quoting:
Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what
they conceal is vital.

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"Tim Ronson" <TimR66@msn.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BD17E1E302420C8FF02845B0@news.west.earthlink.net...
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:25:26 -0500, Scott Stephenson wrote
> (in article <U_2dnXIRTtPGhW3d4p2dnA@adelphia.com> ):
>
> > "Rxbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
> > news:rmarkoff-40222A.05181410072004@news05.east.earthlink.net...
> >> http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/ [...] nd.jsp?s=3
> >>
> >>
> >> Has the chart where ONLY SprintPCS gets the lowest rating.
> >>
> >> The NATIONAL ratings which for the 3rd year in a row put SprintPCS at
> >> the bottom rung.
> >
> > Interesting, Phil- Sprint is not rated lowest on that page. Wanna try
again?
>
> Sprint's also rated lowest in the post at Sprintusers.com

Oh ... you mean your post Phillipe? Creating another new ID I see. Also
posting with multiple IDs in the same thread again?

Phillipe, you ever wonder why you are the only one here who's concerned with
those JD Power polls?

Bob