Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > good cost-effective digital recorder

good cost-effective digital recorder

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - good cost-effective digital recorder

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Dear all:
I have been looking at portable digital recorder to replace my Tascam
DAT portable which has given many good years of service. I have looked
at the Marantz PMD670 and 660 and Edirol R1 and R4. These come close,
but all seem to lack digital inputs. Is there a device with similar
capabilities (solid state, good preamp, SLR connectors, phantom power,
digital audio in/out, USB2.0 or firewire) with digital input also?

Thanks very much,
Richard

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Richard Chapman wrote:
> Dear all:
> I have been looking at portable digital recorder to replace my Tascam
> DAT portable which has given many good years of service. I have looked
> at the Marantz PMD670 and 660 and Edirol R1 and R4. These come close,
> but all seem to lack digital inputs. Is there a device with similar
> capabilities (solid state, good preamp, SLR connectors, phantom power,
> digital audio in/out, USB2.0 or firewire) with digital input also?
>
> Thanks very much,
> Richard
>

Check out the SD-744T.
http://www.sounddevices.com/

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <1108590156.511725.179570@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> chapman@eng.auburn.edu writes:

> I have been looking at portable digital recorder to replace my Tascam
> DAT portable which has given many good years of service. I have looked
> at the Marantz PMD670 and 660 and Edirol R1 and R4. These come close,
> but all seem to lack digital inputs. Is there a device with similar
> capabilities (solid state, good preamp, SLR connectors, phantom power,
> digital audio in/out, USB2.0 or firewire) with digital input also?

Fostex FR2
http://www.fostex.com/index.php?file=products/pfr/fr2

But what's that RCA jack on the left side of the Edirol R4 that's marked
"Digital Input"?

--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

The PMD 670 has digital I/O. And USB port. My experience
with it is quite positive.


TM




Richard Chapman wrote:
>
> Dear all:
> I have been looking at portable digital recorder to replace my Tascam
> DAT portable which has given many good years of service. I have looked
> at the Marantz PMD670 and 660 and Edirol R1 and R4. These come close,
> but all seem to lack digital inputs.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Richard Chapman <chapman@eng.auburn.edu> wrote:

>I have been looking at portable digital recorder to replace my Tascam
>DAT portable which has given many good years of service. I have looked
>at the Marantz PMD670 and 660 and Edirol R1 and R4. These come close,
>but all seem to lack digital inputs. Is there a device with similar
>capabilities (solid state, good preamp, SLR connectors, phantom power,
>digital audio in/out, USB2.0 or firewire) with digital input also?

Yes: PDAudio:

http://www.core-sound.com/HighResRecorderNews.html

We have a Web page that compares PDAudio to the Marantz PMD670, Edirol
R1, Fostex FR-2:

http://www.core-sound.com/comparis [...] -fr-2.html

--
Len Moskowitz PDAudio, Binaural Mics, Cables, DPA, M-Audio
Core Sound http://www.stealthmicrophones.com
Teaneck, New Jersey USA http://www.core-sound.com
moskowit@core-sound.com Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > good cost-effective digital recorder
Go to:

There are 1298 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them