I'm using a firepod for recording with a beta 52, three sm57's, an mxl603's
and a sennheiser e835.. when i bought my firepod the site i bought it at had
a promotion where they threw in the sennheiser e835 and 8 whirlwind emc20
20foot cables for 'free'. the whirlwind cables seem to go for anywhere from
$9-15 each on most sites so i'm guessing they're pretty bottom of the barrel..
anyhow i don't know anything about mic cables although i do know that i'm not
interested in spending $500 for 8 cables.. how much does the quality of a mic
cable influence the sound? ie, would i notice a difference in recording
quality between these whirlwind cables and say a mid range $25 cable?
Steve
How far are you likely to run your inherited mic cables to the input
interface?
Are these budget extension cables *already* fitted with good make 3-p male
and female XLRs?
Are you going to coil and uncoil them repeatedly (daily) for a long period?
Do you know what the type of cable used in their assembly is? - its ID may
be silk-screened along the jacket.
Jim
steve <steve@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm using a firepod for recording with a beta 52, three sm57's, an mxl603's
> and a sennheiser e835.. when i bought my firepod the site i bought it at had
> a promotion where they threw in the sennheiser e835 and 8 whirlwind emc20
> 20foot cables for 'free'. the whirlwind cables seem to go for anywhere from
> $9-15 each on most sites so i'm guessing they're pretty bottom of the barrel..
> anyhow i don't know anything about mic cables although i do know that i'm not
> interested in spending $500 for 8 cables.. how much does the quality of a mic
> cable influence the sound? ie, would i notice a difference in recording
> quality between these whirlwind cables and say a mid range $25 cable?
The influence on sound is likely quite minimal for most purposes. Based
on the types of mics you are using, I don't believe you are doing
highly critical minimalist recordings of acoustic music where in can
be more of a factor.
What may be more important is reliability/build quality. Really cheap
cables tend to fail sooner---either at the connector or occasionally
at some mystery place in the middle of the cable.
But I thought Whirlwind was of reasonable quality in the same range as
Digiflex. I still really like those old Whirlwind guitar cables with
the white plastic/brass connectors. I have to admit I never fully trusted
the fact that the brass housing does not fully enclose the signal with
a shield---but I always like the look and feel of them. And I have
ones that are 20 years old that have never failed.
>Probably not unless the cable breaks....... then you will notice a big
>change.
>
>The cheaper cables may be more likely to break due to mechanical
>stress.
well now that they're setup they're probably not going to get moved much,
im not gigging or anything.. these were free so i'm only concerned with
the sound quality not durability. if they break i'll replace them but
i don't want to record with cables that are going to give me an inferior
sound quality compared to mid range reasonably priced cables..
steve <steve@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>well i didn't spend any money on them so i don't care if they fail,
You will. When you have a cable shield go open at the connector when you
have the gain turned wide open, and suddenly the resulting hum blows your
speakers out, you'll care.
>i just care about the quality of the recording, incidently these are
>whirlwind cables.. their low end stuff i guess.
Those aren't bad. You should SEE how cheap cables get. They get WAY
cheaper than that, and people buy them. And then I get called out when
they fail. I cost more than good cables do.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
"steve" <steve@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:muoSd.11740$Am3.333611@news20.bellglobal.com...
> I'm using a firepod for recording with a beta 52, three sm57's, an
> mxl603's
> and a sennheiser e835.. when i bought my firepod the site i bought it at
> had
> a promotion where they threw in the sennheiser e835 and 8 whirlwind emc20
> 20foot cables for 'free'. the whirlwind cables seem to go for anywhere
> from
> $9-15 each on most sites so i'm guessing they're pretty bottom of the
> barrel..
>
> anyhow i don't know anything about mic cables although i do know that i'm
> not
> interested in spending $500 for 8 cables.. how much does the quality of a
> mic
> cable influence the sound? ie, would i notice a difference in recording
> quality between these whirlwind cables and say a mid range $25 cable?
As far as "fidelity" is concerned, it doesn't make any difference. Mike
cable problems are all caused by poor shielding, triboelectricity or
problems caused by phantom power. Test for this by stepping on the cable
while recording. Run the cable next to AC line cords with current flowing.
If you have no audible problems--well, you have no problems.
>>well i didn't spend any money on them so i don't care if they fail,
>
> You will. When you have a cable shield go open at the connector when you
> have the gain turned wide open, and suddenly the resulting hum blows your
> speakers out, you'll care.
>
>>i just care about the quality of the recording, incidently these are
>>whirlwind cables.. their low end stuff i guess.
>
> Those aren't bad. You should SEE how cheap cables get. They get WAY
> cheaper than that, and people buy them. And then I get called out when
> they fail. I cost more than good cables do.
> --scott
Oh well, if they work and the results sound OKto you, and the cables are
going to stay there till the next fad, why do you ask? You could spend a
real fortune on hyped linkage cable, but you'll never *hear* the difference
with 20ft runs, but here the screening methods and properties are really
what count:
screened quad (heavy duty), braided twisted pair (best practical), lapped
(sometimes OK for mic levels), or foil jacket with a drain wire (line levels
only).
PS Are the mic ends of the cables subject to flexing and repositioning, ie
stands, booms, mounts, roving, swapping? This activity will count as fair
wear and tear, and sudden rupture could let you down when you are most
pressed for an urgent session.
Jim
"steve" wrote ...
> I'm using a firepod for recording with a beta 52, three sm57's,
> an mxl603's and a sennheiser e835.. when i bought my firepod
> the site i bought it at had a promotion where they threw in the
> sennheiser e835 and 8 whirlwind emc20 20foot cables for 'free'.
> the whirlwind cables seem to go for anywhere from $9-15 each
> on most sites so i'm guessing they're pretty bottom of the barrel..
They are actually pretty good value for the money. Don't buy into
the hype of "premium priced", "boutique", "snake-oil" overpriced
cables like "Monster" and such.
> anyhow i don't know anything about mic cables although i do
> know that i'm not interested in spending $500 for 8 cables..
Your common sense is in better working order than some people
who stumble through here. :-)
> how much does the quality of a mic cable influence the sound?
"Catastrophic failures" (i.e. opens and/or shorts) will make
drastic changes in the "quality" (and likely even *existence*)
of the mic signal. Quality mic cable is mechanically sound
enough for the treatment you will give it. And quality mic
cable will have something approaching 100% shielding
coverage.
> ie, would i notice a difference in recording quality between
> these whirlwind cables and say a mid range $25 cable?
Highly unlikely. You could be listening for a long, long time
to try to hear differences between decent cables. Assuming
you are comparing cables of some nominal quality (with decent
connectors, etc.) You likely have better things to do with your
time than to try to hear qualitative differences between cables.
In article <muoSd.11740$Am3.333611@news20.bellglobal.com> steve@yahoo.com writes:
> would i notice a difference in recording
> quality between these whirlwind cables and say a mid range $25 cable?
Nope. Use what you got. They'll work just fine.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.