<kevindoylemusic@rogers.com> wrote:
>What are good powered reference monotors between $1-2k.
>I am used to Yamaha NS-10m's
If you are used to the NS-10, you may want to consider just getting a used
pair of NS-10s and an amp, because it's going to be a huge shock going from
the NS-10 to a different monitor. A lot of the tricks you are probably used
to aren't going to work any more.
But for just a little bit more than your price range, I think you
can get the Genelec S-30s which are among favorites for classical work.
I know Genelec has a reputation for being very forward and sharp but the
S-30s aren't that way.
Some of the newer series of baby Genelec monitors that are replacing the
old 1031 and 1032 boxes actually seem very promising. I did some quick
listening on them but I have never done any serious mixing so I can't say.
They are far more neutral than the older series although still more forward
than the S-30. They do almost have real imaging, though.
Also you might like the little B&W monitors. If you have worked on the
big B&W 801s in the past, the small B&Ws are voiced similarly. Lots
different than the NS-10s, though.
I can say nice things about the NHT S-20 as well, but like the B&Ws they
also aren't powered and will require an external amp.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Plenty of people seem to like going from NS-10 to KRK. I like them, but
monitors... personal preference and all that. The only thing I have
found is that Genelecs sound lovely and can lead to a false sense of
security if used alone... maybe a little flattering but great used with
something for context.
I have a set of A.D.A.M. P11As that I love! Sweetwater carries them.
Stu Nevitt
<kevindoylemusic@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:1109607246.091127.163660@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> What are good powered reference monotors between $1-2k.
> I am used to Yamaha NS-10m's
> kevin
>
<kevindoylemusic@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:1109607246.091127.163660@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> What are good powered reference monotors between $1-2k.
> I am used to Yamaha NS-10m's
> kevin
The Tannoy "System" series are pretty good. I compared them to the
Mackies, which by comparison seemed to have bunched up, muddy mids,
harsh highs and exaggerated bottom.
The mid range on the Tannoys is smooth while quite revealing (maybe
something to do with the concentric design and resulting crossover
maybe?). The top seems a little soft at first, but eventually you
realize that it's all there, it's just not as unnaturally "sharp" as
you're used to. The bottom is maybe a touch muted, but I'll take that
over exaggerated any day.
The big, big, big benefit I've found to mixing with several different
sizes of Tannoy concentrics is that mixes invariably translate well to
other systems.
--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good
In article <1109607246.091127.163660@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> kevindoylemusic@rogers.com writes:
> What are good powered reference monotors between $1-2k.
Refernce monitors cost much more than that. For $1-2K you can get
decent mixing monitors. Surely they have music stores where you are.
Go see what they've got set up, do some listening, tell us what you
think and then ask what we think.
> I am used to Yamaha NS-10m's
You might like the new version of the Tannoy Reveal 5A. They have a
soft dome tweeter rather than the Tannoy 50 kHz super tweeter, so you
don't need any toilet paper over the tweeters to tame them.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
<kevindoylemusic@rogers.com> wrote in message news:1109607246.091127.163660@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> What are good powered reference monotors between $1-2k.
> I am used to Yamaha NS-10m's
> kevin
>
Nearfields are kinda' like underwear. It takes a year or so on any set
of near-field monitors before you can really trust what they're telling
you and learn to adjust. Don't toss your NS-10s for a while. <g>
They don't sound very close to an NS-10 (depending on what the NS-10
is being driven by), but the Yamaha MSP-10 is a dynamite self-powered
speaker. My first experience with them came back in September, when
I had to make a quick comparison between those, some Mackie HR-824
(which I am satisfied are acceptable as well), and some Event 2020's.
They were hands-down the more revealing and accurate of the three sets,
at least in my opinion.
I took some copies of raw tracks and some rough mixes home after each
session to listen to them on my Tannoy 6.5s and Klipsch KG-4s (which
are burned into my ears for years now) and they translated extremely
well. What I was hearing from the MSP-10s in the make-shift control
room, was exactly what I was striving for. With a little 'surprise' in my
state of mind, I took them into a real studio where I do a lot of work and
listened to the recordings on TADs, and the tracks still sounded exactly
as I had both hoped for and was hearing during recording. I guess that's
a long way around saying that the MSP-10 kicked butt for me and might
be worth a listen.
Sorry I can't offer more, but self powered monitors aren't something that
I deal with a lot.
I'm pretty much a nut over anything that Tannoy has made in the past
10 years or so, and I do virtually everything at mix time on a set of Tannoy
6.5s. I moved to the Tannoys from NS-10s almost 10 years ago and never
looked back at all. They were far more comfortable to listen to over longer
periods of time.
It probably wouldn't hurt either of us to check out what Tannoys has to
offer in powered monitors these days. They still seem to put the proof
in the pudding (user comments) rather that into hype and advertising.
In article <YCSUd.70460$uc.1130@trnddc04> mams@NOSPAm-a-m-s.com writes:
> Nearfields are kinda' like underwear. It takes a year or so on any set
> of near-field monitors before you can really trust what they're telling
> you and learn to adjust.
Now that's an analogy! Does it really take you a year to get used to
new underwear, and what do you adjust in order to trust your
underwear?
Wait a minute! Don't answer that!
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message news:znr1109681011k@trad...
>
> In article <YCSUd.70460$uc.1130@trnddc04> mams@NOSPAm-a-m-s.com writes:
>
> > Nearfields are kinda' like underwear. It takes a year or so on any set
> > of near-field monitors before you can really trust what they're telling
> > you and learn to adjust.
>
> Now that's an analogy! Does it really take you a year to get used to
> new underwear, and what do you adjust in order to trust your
> underwear?
All I meant was that monitors are... um... up close and personal.
I really don't even wear underwear unless it's long-johns in the winter....
so I'm pretty certain that it would take some time to feel comfortable
doing so.
David Morgan \(MAMS\) <mams@NOSPAm-a-m-s.com> wrote:
>
>I really don't even wear underwear unless it's long-johns in the winter....
>so I'm pretty certain that it would take some time to feel comfortable
>doing so.
That's okay, I use nearfields about as often....
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.