1.) Fans draw air from the sides, so sucking actually increases the "dead spot".
clearly you dont understand the airflow through a heatsink, a pulling design WITH A GAP BETWEEN FAN AND HEATSINK reduces the effect of the dead spot. (granted there must be a shroud around the heatsink/fan junction to produce a wind tunnel like effect)
2.) Compressed air is more dense, and dense air has more cooling capacity
thats exactly what i said, if you actually read my writing you will see that in my conclusion i recommended the pushing design.
3.)Because fans blow forward, the air can travel all the way to the base of a heatsink when the fan blows. Even though it's not aerodynamic, the striking air on the base creates a circular flow pattern on the base, and is remixed with other air as it escapes from the side. In the suck pattern, the base is a "dead spot", where in the blow pattern, it's a spot of high turbulance.
i have clearly stated the effect on the base of the heatsink by a pushing design, i also went to great detail explaining that sucking design places mos of the cooling action on the fins of the heatsink.....are you literate?
4.) Alpha tries to get around the pull from the side problem by using a skirt. In this configuration, most of the cooling area is dead air, with the skirt itself receiving most of the cooling
i dont see how that statements contradicts with what i said.
5.) Air near the board is hot from other chips, therefore the skirt puts the area from which air is pulled into a higher temperature zone. You're pulling warm air instead of pushing cool air.
oh my god, thats exactly what i said, seriously, are you retarded?
6.) Air does not like to be pulled, see density in #2
hmm goes further to support my conclusion that blowing designs are better at cooling.
7.) All the things I've said have been proven in practice on ALPHA sinks! Many sites have tested the suck vs. blow patterns and found that Alpha's run cooler if you flip the fan to a normal push configuration!
ok, again that goes to support my conclusion..are you just contradicting me to hear yourself talk?
Don't ask me to look those sites up as this is all stuff rehashed from the same argument 2 years ago. I won back then and I don't think physics have changed since.
nothing is asked from you, however everythinhg you said here goes to support my conclusions so your claim that my research is wrong goes to toot your own horn. You are arguing with my points by restating what i said in different terms, however in effect you said the same thing. hmmmm....
Asus A7N8X ND + Athlong XP 2700(2.17ghz)
Mine is 192fsb x 12 = 2304mhz @ 1.775v
Corsair PC 3500 512 @ 5-3-3-2T
Audigy 2, Western Digital 80GIG SE 8meg cache
and Some CocknBalls.