I'm trying to make up my list of what I want for my new computer. Got to Sound Card. Looked at reviews and comparisons. Then, just by chance, since I am not a gamer, I checked out the new (5 Apr 03) comparison of different audio solutions on gaming sound on Tom's Hardware. They looked at how onboard and real cards affected performance & CPU usage. The best performance was from the nVIDIA nForce2 MCP-T CPU. The charts showed it outperforming Creative Labs' Audigy 2. "Like a sound card, it processes sound without putting much of a load on the CPU." It does this (if I have understood what I have read elsewhere here) by using their APU (Audio Processing Unit), which is on the Southbridge of the chip set, while most CPU operations take place on the Northbridge. Tom's says "For AMD fans, we can only recommend the excellent nForce2." However, I notice when looking at specs for computers such as ABS's Awesome AMD models, they have an ASUS A7N8X motherboard (which uses the nVIDIA nForce2 MCP-T) with an AMD Athlon XP and a Creative Audigy 2. Is this overkill or redundance, or does it mean that while the APU gives outstanding performance in games, a classical music fan (me) would also need a separate card such as the Audigy?
Lynn
Lynn