Wireless adapter for windows 98 millenium

cathcart

Honorable
Feb 13, 2013
3
0
10,510
Hello,
im looking for a wireless adapter for windows millennium not windows 98 as millennium and 98 or similar but two different operating systems and i know that this is quite hard but on forums some people have done it
its a desktop machine and has a 32 bit system
can any one point me in the right direction ?

thanks
 

gerry410

Distinguished
Jun 17, 2010
577
0
19,010

Go to Newegg.com and get a usb adapter.
 
You're better off using a wireless ethernet adapter (aka client bridge) because it doesn't require OS drivers! All the wireless functionality resides in the bridge. The OS doesn't even know wireless is in the picture. And all you need is an ethernet port.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&N=-1&isNodeId=1&Description=nano+router&x=0&y=0 (in client mode)
http://www.rakuten.com/prod/levelone-wbr-6802-150mbps-wireless-travel-router/235640919.html (in client mode)
http://www.rakuten.com/prod/zyxel-mwr102-wireless-n-pocket-travel-router-and-access-point/225181385.html (in client mode)
 

cathcart

Honorable
Feb 13, 2013
3
0
10,510
 
 

gerry410

Distinguished
Jun 17, 2010
577
0
19,010
2 questions please.
I want to make sure i understand this.

1. I think what your saying is this item takes the place of an installed PCI card or wireless usb adapter and allows you to connect to a wireless network with your existing ethernet port?

2. Is the signal strength degraded as opposed to a hard wired computer?
 


Yes.



Whether you use a wireless ethernet bridge, PCI adapter, or USB adapter, they're ALL wireless radio. They all have the same basic wireless chipsets, and they all use antennas of one sort or another. But w/ the wireless ethernet bridge, you’re pushing the wireless radio out and away from your PC. Besides not having to deal w/ compatibility issues, this probably ENHANCES your wireless signal for several reasons. First, it’s farther away from any EMI that your computer may be producing. Second, your placement/orientation options for best signal reception are much greater (limited only by the ethernet cable, 100m unamplified). And third, the antenna solutions are often better, esp. if you choose to use a full-sized router (some support client bridging natively, while others support third party firmware that does too).

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3334084&CatId=2668

The above D-Link DIR-615 can be updated w/ dd-wrt (third party firmware) to support wireless ethernet bridging (and many other options). The advantage here is the much better antennas. And the fact the integrated switch means you can have MULTIPLE ethernet devices sharing the wireless bridge. The downside is the much bigger footprint (at least some ppl would consider that a negative in some situations; e.g., it's not very portable).