Hello,
I have a chart here that shows the relationship of cable length to 1/4
and 1/30th wavelengths of certain frequencies. Is the 1/4 wave
important because it will have a node on one end and an anti-node on
the other of one RF cycle? Why is 1/30th of a wave important in cable
design?
On 9 Mar 2005 07:25:13 -0800, thecatspjamas@aol.com wrote:
>Hello,
> I have a chart here that shows the relationship of cable length to 1/4
>and 1/30th wavelengths of certain frequencies. Is the 1/4 wave
>important because it will have a node on one end and an anti-node on
>the other of one RF cycle? Why is 1/30th of a wave important in cable
>design?
>
>Thanks,
>Peter
Roughly speaking, it is about the limit at which cable effects start
becoming significant.
In article <1110381913.649313.190980@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> thecatspjamas@aol.com writes:
> I have a chart here that shows the relationship of cable length to 1/4
> and 1/30th wavelengths of certain frequencies. Is the 1/4 wave
> important because it will have a node on one end and an anti-node on
> the other of one RF cycle?
Yup.
> Why is 1/30th of a wave important in cable design?
Probably someone's idea of where the length of the cable is
insignificant and doesn't contribute to reflected power. It's why,
even though companies would rather sell you digital cables, you can
get away with using mic cable for AES/EBU connections and home video
cables for S/PDIF coax.
Applying a conservative velocity factor (how much slower than the
speed of light electricity travels in a cable rather than a vacuum), a
wavelength at 96 kHz is about 2,000 meters. Most of our digital
cable runs are considerably less than 1/30 of that, about 200 feet.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
On 9 Mar 2005 07:25:13 -0800, thecatspjamas@aol.com wrote:
> I have a chart here that shows the relationship of cable length to 1/4
>and 1/30th wavelengths of certain frequencies. Is the 1/4 wave
>important because it will have a node on one end and an anti-node on
>the other of one RF cycle?
A 1/4 wavelength line is special because if you stick a signal
into one end and don't terminate the other, the signal travels
to the far end, is reflected, travels back another 1/4 wavelength,
and arrives back at the source in opposite polarity. That's
how you make antennas.
Interesting in acoustics, but not an issue in audio electronics
for ordinary folks.
Chris Hornbeck wrote:
> On 9 Mar 2005 07:25:13 -0800, thecatspjamas@aol.com wrote:
>
> > I have a chart here that shows the relationship of cable length to
1/4
> >and 1/30th wavelengths of certain frequencies. Is the 1/4 wave
> >important because it will have a node on one end and an anti-node on
> >the other of one RF cycle?
>
> A 1/4 wavelength line is special because if you stick a signal
> into one end and don't terminate the other, the signal travels
> to the far end, is reflected, travels back another 1/4 wavelength,
> and arrives back at the source in opposite polarity. That's
> how you make antennas.
>
> Interesting in acoustics, but not an issue in audio electronics
> for ordinary folks.
>
> Chris Hornbeck
True when the "unterminated" end is an open circuit.
When the "unterminated" end is a short circuit, then the wave is
inverted by the reflection and ends up back at the original polarity
(phase) back at the source.
Is a sound wave bouncing off a wall analogous to the electrical short
circuit case (inverted by the reflection) or the electrical open
circuit case? I would guess the short circuit case but I'm not sure.
On 10 Mar 2005 08:34:53 -0800, "Mark" <makolber@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Is a sound wave bouncing off a wall analogous to the electrical short
>circuit case (inverted by the reflection) or the electrical open
>circuit case? I would guess the short circuit case but I'm not sure.
An acoustical "short circuit" would be high velocity and low
pressure, and for a lot of speaker discussions this is also a
good-enough-for-rockandroll description of free air.
In the nearfield (by definition) all diaphragms couple well to
free air. In the farfield (by definition) none do.
The poorly named "transmission line" speaker enclosure classically
terminates the line into free air. Fibrous tangle in the line
changes the speed of propegation (lots) and the Theory (such as
it is) is for 1/4 wavelength at the (much slower) internal speed.
Skakey models aside, reduction in Q-sub-TC to below Q-sub-TS is
possible.
Sorry about the frivilous electrical line comments. The OP deserved
better. Thanks for yours,
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.