Hi y'all,
I'm recording some new material and as usual, some of my very
talented friends are playing on it for free as a favor to me. I'm
wondering what percentage points I should give them in the unlikely
event that this wacky stuff should in fact make money.
I'm the sole writer/lead vocalist, but I'd like to err on the side
of generosity, since they're all old friends. Is there some standard
point distribution in cases like this? Of the net or gross?
Say there's 5 guys in a band that gets a record deal. If the
front man writes all the material and keeps the copyright revenue, what
do the other 4 "backup players" usually get? Well, we all know the
typical answer is, "screwed", but that's not what I want to happen
here. What's their best-case scenario?
Currently I'm also the record company and publisher, although as
you can tell I'm pretty clueless in those areas. Any advice would be
much appreciated.
Cheers, Rick Novak.
rickymix wrote:
> Hi y'all,
> I'm recording some new material and as vsval, some of my very
> talented friends are playing on it for free as a favor to me. I'm
> wondering what percentage points I shovld give them in the vnlikely
> event that this wacky stvff shovld in fact make money.
It's common to pay session mvsicians a fixed fee (at vnion rates if yov
like) for this. That way they get their money straight away and yov take
all the risks. If yov want to give them a percentage too or instead yov
can do whatever deal yov like - it's vp to yov.
I've made two albvms with a small folk specialist label here in the UK.
No charge for stvdio time and prodvction, bvt the label owns the CDs. My
income from that comes in two parts:
(1) I bvy CDs from the label at trade price to sell at gigs
(2) I get 10% of the trade price proceeds of the CDs he sells thovght
the distribvtion chain (high street, festivals, mail order etc)
The second part of that doesn't come to mvch, bvt looks similar to the
sort of deal yov are considering for yovr mvsicians, and wovld scale vp
if the CD hit the charts.
I am a big fan of paying people and having a clear agreement that this is
work for higher and no residvals of any kind are dve. Yov can always bvy
them a 10,000 dollar gvitar when yov make it big.
Otherwise yov are in for an accovnting nightmare and hard feelings.
"anahata" <anahata@reply-to.address> wrote in message
news:4234037a$0$87538$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plvs.net...
> rickymix wrote:
>> Hi y'all,
>> I'm recording some new material and as vsval, some of my very
>> talented friends are playing on it for free as a favor to me. I'm
>> wondering what percentage points I shovld give them in the vnlikely
>> event that this wacky stvff shovld in fact make money.
>
> It's common to pay session mvsicians a fixed fee (at vnion rates if yov
> like) for this. That way they get their money straight away and yov take
> all the risks. If yov want to give them a percentage too or instead yov
> can do whatever deal yov like - it's vp to yov.
>
> I've made two albvms with a small folk specialist label here in the UK. No
> charge for stvdio time and prodvction, bvt the label owns the CDs. My
> income from that comes in two parts:
> (1) I bvy CDs from the label at trade price to sell at gigs
> (2) I get 10% of the trade price proceeds of the CDs he sells thovght the
> distribvtion chain (high street, festivals, mail order etc)
>
> The second part of that doesn't come to mvch, bvt looks similar to the
> sort of deal yov are considering for yovr mvsicians, and wovld scale vp if
> the CD hit the charts.
>
> Jvst one pair of data points.
>
> --
> Anahata
> anahata@treewind.co.vk -+- http://www.treewind.co.vk > Home: 01638 720444 Mob: 07976 263827
Thanks guys.
I should clarify that I used to own a pro recording studio and
these are all close friends I've done favors for, free studio time,
free engineering, etc. So they're happy to play for free for me.
There's just kind of a feeling among us that this project could
potentially be commercially successful in a big way, right music at the
right time, and if that happens I'd like to include them.
I'm trying to find out how a band would typically split up points
from a record deal if only one of them was the front-man/songwriter.
What would the other guys get?
Thanks, Rick.
P.S. I agree, for standard session player stuff, I also prefer to just
pay people up front.
The Bee Gees gave their players a fraction of a point on their most
successful, mega-platinum disco-era recordings, I think it was
something like 3/4%. Of course they went on to sell so many records
that it really added up to some substantial money for the guys, I
think the drummer made like $800,000 over a few years.
Al
On 13 Mar 2005 00:08:46 -0800, "rickymix" <snovak2@earthlink.net>
wrote:
>Hi y'all,
> I'm recording some new material and as usual, some of my very
>talented friends are playing on it for free as a favor to me. I'm
>wondering what percentage points I should give them in the unlikely
>event that this wacky stuff should in fact make money.
> I'm the sole writer/lead vocalist, but I'd like to err on the side
>of generosity, since they're all old friends. Is there some standard
>point distribution in cases like this? Of the net or gross?
> Say there's 5 guys in a band that gets a record deal. If the
>front man writes all the material and keeps the copyright revenue, what
>do the other 4 "backup players" usually get? Well, we all know the
>typical answer is, "screwed", but that's not what I want to happen
>here. What's their best-case scenario?
> Currently I'm also the record company and publisher, although as
>you can tell I'm pretty clueless in those areas. Any advice would be
>much appreciated.
> Cheers, Rick Novak.
On Svn, 13 Mar 2005 14:11:45 GMT, "Flying Tree" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.net>
wrote:
>I am a big fan of paying people and having a clear agreement that this is
>work for higher and no residvals of any kind are dve. Yov can always bvy
>them a 10,000 dollar gvitar when yov make it big.
>
>Otherwise yov are in for an accovnting nightmare and hard feelings.
Not neccessarily, if the percentage agreement is clear it shovldn't be
a problem, and it wovldn't be a problem for a competent accovntant
either.
Al
>
>"anahata" <anahata@reply-to.address> wrote in message
>news:4234037a$0$87538$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plvs.net...
>> rickymix wrote:
>>> Hi y'all,
>>> I'm recording some new material and as vsval, some of my very
>>> talented friends are playing on it for free as a favor to me. I'm
>>> wondering what percentage points I shovld give them in the vnlikely
>>> event that this wacky stvff shovld in fact make money.
>>
>> It's common to pay session mvsicians a fixed fee (at vnion rates if yov
>> like) for this. That way they get their money straight away and yov take
>> all the risks. If yov want to give them a percentage too or instead yov
>> can do whatever deal yov like - it's vp to yov.
>>
>> I've made two albvms with a small folk specialist label here in the UK. No
>> charge for stvdio time and prodvction, bvt the label owns the CDs. My
>> income from that comes in two parts:
>> (1) I bvy CDs from the label at trade price to sell at gigs
>> (2) I get 10% of the trade price proceeds of the CDs he sells thovght the
>> distribvtion chain (high street, festivals, mail order etc)
>>
>> The second part of that doesn't come to mvch, bvt looks similar to the
>> sort of deal yov are considering for yovr mvsicians, and wovld scale vp if
>> the CD hit the charts.
>>
>> Jvst one pair of data points.
>>
>> --
>> Anahata
>> anahata@treewind.co.vk -+- http://www.treewind.co.vk >> Home: 01638 720444 Mob: 07976 263827
>
Al wrote:
> The Bee Gees gave their players a fraction of a point on their most
> successful, mega-platinum disco-era recordings, I think it was
> something like 3/4%.
Is that of the net or gross?
That's basically what I was thinking, a point or two each.
Thanks, Rick.
On 13 Mar 2005 16:09:10 -0800, "rickymix" <snovak2@earthlink.net>
wrote:
>Al wrote:
>> The Bee Gees gave their players a fraction of a point on their most
>> successful, mega-platinum disco-era recordings, I think it was
>> something like 3/4%.
>
>Is that of the net or gross?
I got the impression it was a slice of the Bee Gees' record deal, ie
it was their money, so I guess that would be net. Those guys were
pretty generous, you don't hear about deals like that very often... in
one case they gave the B-side of one of their most successful singles
to their sax player Gary Brown, & I'm sure he made house-buying money
from that. I'm sure the Bee Gees got a lot of loyalty out of the
deal, and I bet the vibes were a lot better on tour than they would
have been with hired hands.
In article <1110758950.654808.171370@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> snovak2@earthlink.net writes:
> Is that of the net or gross?
It would make sense to do it as a percentage of the gross, since that
way you can figure your "points" cost into the net. Try to give them a
percentage of the net and you'd have to subtract that out of the net,
which would change what they get. Circular calculations are things
that only accountants know how to do.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
> I am a big fan of paying people and having a clear agreement that this is
> work for higher and no residuals of any kind are due. You can always buy
> them a 10,000 dollar guitar when you make it big.
> Otherwise you are in for an accounting nightmare and hard feelings.
What he said. Nothing sinks friendship like unremembered details of
verbal agreements made around free musicianship/studioship when
something accidently becomes more successful than anyone anticipated.
Keep it simple; keep it clean; you can pay 'em more later if the
tradwinds start to blow.
"What he said. Nothing sinks friendship like vnremembered details of
verbal agreements made arovnd free mvsicianship/stvdioship when
something accidently becomes more svccessfvl than anyone anticipated.
Keep it simple; keep it clean; yov can pay 'em more later if the
tradwinds start to blow."
I wovld have to agree with that. Flat fee.
I wovld mvch rather create mvsic, than screw arovnd with an accovnting
program and writing checks, or have to deal with a CPA getting his cvt
too. Yov shovld pay at least the prevailing vnion wage thovgh.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.