I'm getting some very low scores and read write scores as well. the average seek time is better then SCSI! the average seek is from 2ms to 4ms!!! thats amazingly low. But i'm getting 14MB/s read and write speeds? However it is the sosoft sandra benchmark i'm running. It could be just buggy.
But i did set the cluster size for RAID at 64k. I bet thats the problem. I do have another drive isntalled as well. Just my old drive. I'm keeping until i get time this weekend to reinstall the OS and stuff.
Also i just thought of it. I have the IT7 mobo and one WD drive is on the first master and the other drive is on the 4th slave. (4 IDE ports on the RAID controller, i think it's 2 raid controllers in one. 1 and 2 would be controller 1 and 3 and 4 would be controller 2, now because the raid is split on both controllers maybe that is reducing the speed!?
alright well .. i'm gonna play with it some more though .. anyone got any thoughts from their experience?
also for the love of god can someone, anyone, tell me wtf the cluster size thing is? i guess asking what a good size to use for video editing is a bad question. Maybe if I ask what is it it would help lol
I may not have read ya post well but all drives on the 4 ch raid controller must be set to master and be on the end of each of the four cables, cluster size I am still waiting myself for some advice. I am as confussed about it as you bro.
(I have found sometimes "CS" jumper on WD drives needs to be selected but not always! Clear? yeah, clear as mud
cant tell ya about why your getting a slower benchmark - it should be transferring at the normal rate at a minimum(50mb/sec or so)
I;ll assume you set up a lvl 0 array
but the cluster size is the size of each bunch of data that it puts on each hard drive
For example, if you have the cluster size set to 8kb, it'll put 8kb on one harddrive, and then 8kb on the other, then 8kb on the first again, and so on.
Unless you are actully doing video editing, set the cluster size a little lower. I like to have mine at 8kb for games and stuff.
"Finally, for extremely high-end users who play around with applications that read and write really, really large files (i.e. Photoshop, Premiere), RAID 0 with a large stripe size would be a better choice. As we have seen in the High-End DiskMark results, the 512KB stripe size seems to be the best stripe size."
ya know seriously this is all i wanted to know!!! lol! thanks!
i looked at every little thing in the device manager and nothing is there that you are saying. No advanced tab and no DMA settings. So i'm taking your terminology literally. Where is the "hardware manager" that you speak of?
Okey, dokey... open Control Panel, then System, then Hardware, then Device Manager, then look for IDE ATA/Atapi Controllers and in there you will find your IDE channels... open them and you will find an Advanced tab on which you can set the UDMA to "UDMA if available" for each device... rebooting should then activate UDMA modes for each device that supports it.
You'd be amazed how many people don't know that XP and 2k by default do not enable UDMA modes for all IDE devices. By default only the first hard disk has UDMA enabled.
weird because what you speak of isn't even there. There is no advance tab. Besides i have a RAID controller also that supportes up to 8 IDE devices plus the 4 from the normal IDE channel. thats 12 IDE drives. I don't have any hard drives on the IDE channels you speak of. they are all on the RAID controller which uses scsi drivers.
it's alright though! thanks anyway. On my RAID setup i get 66MB/s now! the U320 15KRPM w/ 8MB cache gets 46MB/s! so this puppy is flyin now! Must have been how i had it set up!