G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group. Is there a
wargamers group where liberal folk don't have to wade through
reactionary do-do to get the good oil. Nothing personal you understand
fellas :)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <43009439$0$15508$61c65585@un-2park-reader-
02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au>, jimmyallen@exetel.com.au says...
> I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group. Is there a
> wargamers group where liberal folk don't have to wade through
> reactionary do-do to get the good oil. Nothing personal you understand
> fellas :)

Here in Virginia, I have to wade through it with everything I do. So,
I'm kind of used to it.

To be fair, on satellite radio, there's a channel with left talk-shows.
It's not much better, I only listened to it once.

Epi

----
I would rather use meek-words than power-words.
----

http://www.curlesneck.com
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Giftzwerg" <giftzwerg999@NOSPAMZ.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d6a72a0f086b70598a4dd@news-east.giganews.com...
> In article <43009439$0$15508$61c65585@un-2park-reader-
> 02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au>, jimmyallen@exetel.com.au says...
>
> > I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group.
>
> And I'm "well jack" of worthless little nancy-boys who use words like
> "cryptofascist" as though they meant anything more than, "Something I
> <sob!> really, *really* hate!!!!!"

there's nothing crypto about your brand of fascism is there gifty.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Jim Allen" <jimmyallen@exetel.com.au> wrote in message
news:43009439$0$15508$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group. Is there a
>wargamers group where liberal folk don't have to wade through reactionary
>do-do to get the good oil. Nothing personal you understand fellas :)

Best thing to do is killfile all of them. Myself, I have nothing better to
do, since gas prices are nearing $3 and our great president, to counter the
high cost, is thinking of invading Iran.

History will certainly not be kind to Georgie: he thinks the world is one
big electric chair and he controls the current.


Alanb
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

Perhaps rec.games.pantysniffingtreehuggingfeministgirlymanwargamers?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:10:22 +1000, Jim Allen
<jimmyallen@exetel.com.au> wrote:

>I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group. Is there a
>wargamers group where liberal folk don't have to wade through
>reactionary do-do to get the good oil. Nothing personal you understand
>fellas :)

LOL great post, just what the group needed, where's the popcorn?

O.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

Jim Allen wrote:
> I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group. Is there a
> wargamers group where liberal folk don't have to wade through
> reactionary do-do to get the good oil. Nothing personal you understand
> fellas :)

You must be new. I'd say the ratio was about 50/50 crypto-fascist to
crypto-communist. (Note: there are no normal people here, though each
side *thinks* they're normal.)

For my part, I wonder why "liberal folk" want to play war games in the
first place. Go plant some flowers, freak! ;-)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Giftzwerg" <giftzwerg999@NOSPAMZ.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d6a8fa567a6e27d98a4de@news-east.giganews.com...
> In article <JrCdnZ2dnZ0-uAjZnZ2dnTUmnd6dnZ2dRVn-052dnZ0@comcast.com>,
> roh@comcast.net says...
>
> > > > I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group.
> > >
> > > And I'm "well jack" of worthless little nancy-boys who use words like
> > > "cryptofascist" as though they meant anything more than, "Something I
> > > <sob!> really, *really* hate!!!!!"
> >
> > there's nothing crypto about your brand of fascism is there gifty.
>
> Using your worthless definition, *everyone* is a more-or-less a fascist.
> That's the point, not that you could possibly understand it. But take
> heart; at least you can *spell* "fascism," so that puts it into an
> entirely lesser catalog of your boundless stupidities.
>
> --
> Giftzwerg

everyone? no, you ? yes.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Alan Bernardo" > > Giftzwerg
>
> Forever bashing, that's your trademark. But at least you're good with
> language: must be an English teacher.
>
> Alanb

in the world of gifty $50 for a wargame is a sin. $50 for a tank of gas is
good.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Briarroot" <woodsyl@iwon.com> wrote in message
news:11g23bq10nuao24@corp.supernews.com...
> Jim Allen wrote:
> > I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group. Is there a
> > wargamers group where liberal folk don't have to wade through
> > reactionary do-do to get the good oil. Nothing personal you understand
> > fellas :)
>
> You must be new. I'd say the ratio was about 50/50 crypto-fascist to
> crypto-communist. (Note: there are no normal people here, though each
> side *thinks* they're normal.)
>
> For my part, I wonder why "liberal folk" want to play war games in the
> first place. Go plant some flowers, freak! ;-)



yeah after all the neo-cons voted for draft dodgers who got cushy guard
billets
and then go awol anyway and dick "i had better things to do than fight in
that war"cheney would they.
and they attacked john"decorated vet"kerry and max cleland.

and don't forget you and gifty were cheering for bush as his minions
attacked john the only repub to actually serve" mccain when he ran in the
primaries.
yeah you neo-cons stand behind our troops as far behind as you can get.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

While taking a short break from the daily grind of enslavement and
world domination, Giftzwerg mentioned

>In article <JrCdnZ2dnZ0-uAjZnZ2dnTUmnd6dnZ2dRVn-052dnZ0@comcast.com>,
>roh@comcast.net says...
>
>> > > I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group.
>> >
>> > And I'm "well jack" of worthless little nancy-boys who use words like
>> > "cryptofascist" as though they meant anything more than, "Something I
>> > <sob!> really, *really* hate!!!!!"
>>
>> there's nothing crypto about your brand of fascism is there gifty.
>
>Using your worthless definition, *everyone* is a more-or-less a fascist.

Quote the definition he's using , IN HIS OWN WORDS! before you
criticise it, thug!

Otherwise you're just using a "straw man" argument and trying to bully
anybody with a different opinion.

>That's the point, not that you could possibly understand it. But take
>heart; at least you can *spell* "fascism," so that puts it into an
>entirely lesser catalog of your boundless stupidities.

..
..
We are Microsoft of Borg.....Your technological distinctiveness will be
added to our own.....Resistance is fu...
......$$@#
..
General Protection Fault in MSBORG32.DLL
...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

While taking a short break from the daily grind of enslavement and
world domination, ray o'hara mentioned

>
>"Alan Bernardo" > > Giftzwerg
>>
>> Forever bashing, that's your trademark. But at least you're good with
>> language: must be an English teacher.
>>
>> Alanb
>
> in the world of gifty $50 for a wargame is a sin. $50 for a tank of gas is
>good.
>
And invading another country to steal THEIR petroleum is even better!
..
..
We are Microsoft of Borg.....Your technological distinctiveness will be
added to our own.....Resistance is fu...
......$$@#
..
General Protection Fault in MSBORG32.DLL
...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

While taking a short break from the daily grind of enslavement and
world domination, Briarroot mentioned

>Jim Allen wrote:
>> I am well jack of all the cryptofascist shite in this group. Is there a
>> wargamers group where liberal folk don't have to wade through
>> reactionary do-do to get the good oil. Nothing personal you understand
>> fellas :)
>
>You must be new. I'd say the ratio was about 50/50 crypto-fascist to
>crypto-communist. (Note: there are no normal people here, though each
>side *thinks* they're normal.)

And some of us are genuine Trotsyite Communists, members of the Party
for many years.

>
>For my part, I wonder why "liberal folk" want to play war games in the
>first place. Go plant some flowers, freak! ;-)

You're using a USA-specific distorted definition of "liberal" which is
a propaganda term in right-wing mouths. It's not accurate. Use the
dictionary definition, not the party-political one.

As to why, it's because we study history, too and we're still working
towards the historical inevitability of the victory of the socialist
dialectic. That's why. So that we can resist the oppression of the
plutocrats and oligarchs.
..
..
We are Microsoft of Borg.....Your technological distinctiveness will be
added to our own.....Resistance is fu...
......$$@#
..
General Protection Fault in MSBORG32.DLL
...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

> History will certainly not be kind to Georgie: he thinks the world is one
> big electric chair and he controls the current.

Considering that he was re-elected, I can't wait for the "toughtful -
post-Bush era analysis" about why the guy who invaded the one country out of
three with the lowest possibility to have WMD (a roll of 1-2 on a six-sided
die - I hope he didn't choose the result by hand) was considered bright
enough to have a second go. You know, those sober "wisdom of the aftermath"
books where the lucky ones manage to deny their involvement and actually to
explain how they were always for doing the opposite thing in the first place
(basically everyone, if the dire period is the result of some "groupthink"
stunt), while the unluckiest "sell their inside stories for six numbers
figures" anyway ("So-called Intelligence: My Life a the CIA During the
'Saddam has the bomb, Dimitri! *That* Bomb, the one we speak so often... the
H-Bomb, Dimitri!' Debacle").

Anyway, luckly America stands ready for anything. ***Anything***! People
from San Marino armed with frozen bottles of mineral water (try to be hit by
one - I was), boys from Papua Nuova Guinea ready to assault the Sears tower
in Chicago with spears and tribal paints, the Pope trying a publicity stunt
by paying Industrial Light and Magic to walk on the waters of NY harbor
while secretly poisoning American body fluids so to cut down sexual
activities outside marriage... anything!

Stanley Kubrick, I miss you.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

While taking a short break from the daily grind of enslavement and
world domination, Vincenzo Beretta mentioned

>> History will certainly not be kind to Georgie: he thinks the world is one
>> big electric chair and he controls the current.
>
>Considering that he was re-elected, I can't wait for the "toughtful -
>post-Bush era analysis" about why the guy who invaded the one country out of
>three with the lowest possibility to have WMD (a roll of 1-2 on a six-sided
>die - I hope he didn't choose the result by hand) was considered bright
>enough to have a second go.

It's far more likely that The Shrub (a junior bush) is a complaisant
sock-puppet for the far more dangerous intelligent conspirators
against democratic processes who prefer to act from the shadows.


>You know, those sober "wisdom of the aftermath"
>books where the lucky ones manage to deny their involvement and actually to
>explain how they were always for doing the opposite thing in the first place
>(basically everyone, if the dire period is the result of some "groupthink"
>stunt), while the unluckiest "sell their inside stories for six numbers
>figures" anyway ("So-called Intelligence: My Life a the CIA During the
>'Saddam has the bomb, Dimitri! *That* Bomb, the one we speak so often... the
>H-Bomb, Dimitri!' Debacle").
>
>Anyway, luckly America stands ready for anything. ***Anything***! People
>from San Marino armed with frozen bottles of mineral water (try to be hit by
>one - I was), boys from Papua Nuova Guinea ready to assault the Sears tower
>in Chicago with spears and tribal paints, the Pope trying a publicity stunt
>by paying Industrial Light and Magic to walk on the waters of NY harbor
>while secretly poisoning American body fluids so to cut down sexual
>activities outside marriage... anything!
>
>Stanley Kubrick, I miss you.
>

..
..
We are Microsoft of Borg.....Your technological distinctiveness will be
added to our own.....Resistance is fu...
......$$@#
..
General Protection Fault in MSBORG32.DLL
...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

ray o'hara wrote:
> "Briarroot" <woodsyl@iwon.com> wrote in message
> news:11g23bq10nuao24@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>For my part, I wonder why "liberal folk" want to play war games in the
>>first place. Go plant some flowers, freak! ;-)
>
>
> and don't forget you and gifty were cheering for bush as his minions
> attacked john the only repub to actually serve" mccain when he ran in the
> primaries.

The only cheering was in your drooling dreams, you putz! I would have
much preferred McCain over Bush, but as a Democrat I don't get to vote
my state's Republican primary elections.


> yeah you neo-cons stand behind our troops as far behind as you can get.
>

Lots of people *other* than neo-cons must have voted for ol' Dubya in
the last election, or he wouldn't have whipped your boy Kerry. But I
understand your ailment. You live in a humorless, black-and-white
world, where everyone who rejects your political idiocy gets labeled a
"neo-con." :-/
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

Vincenzo Beretta wrote:
>
> Considering that he was re-elected, I can't wait for the "toughtful -
> post-Bush era analysis" about why the guy who invaded the one country out of
> three with the lowest possibility to have WMD (a roll of 1-2 on a six-sided
> die - I hope he didn't choose the result by hand) was considered bright
> enough to have a second go. You know, those sober "wisdom of the aftermath"
> books where the lucky ones manage to deny their involvement and actually to
> explain how they were always for doing the opposite thing in the first place
> (basically everyone, if the dire period is the result of some "groupthink"
> stunt), while the unluckiest "sell their inside stories for six numbers
> figures" anyway ("So-called Intelligence: My Life a the CIA During the
> 'Saddam has the bomb, Dimitri! *That* Bomb, the one we speak so often... the
> H-Bomb, Dimitri!' Debacle").
>
> Anyway, luckly America stands ready for anything. ***Anything***! People
> from San Marino armed with frozen bottles of mineral water (try to be hit by
> one - I was), boys from Papua Nuova Guinea ready to assault the Sears tower
> in Chicago with spears and tribal paints, the Pope trying a publicity stunt
> by paying Industrial Light and Magic to walk on the waters of NY harbor
> while secretly poisoning American body fluids so to cut down sexual
> activities outside marriage... anything!

ROTFLMAO

Quick, tell me what you've heard! ;-)


>
> Stanley Kubrick, I miss you.
>

Amen.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

> > As to why, it's because we study history, too and we're still working
> > towards the historical inevitability of the victory of the socialist
> > dialectic. That's why. So that we can resist the oppression of the
> > plutocrats and oligarchs.
>
> ROTFLMAO! (Thanks for the knee-slapping laugh!) :)
>
> [I hereby nominate your post for Most Humorous of the Month]

Well...you're obviously wrong about something. Liberals do like
wargames after all.

Epi

----
It's hard to flip-flop when you only tow the party
line. Personally, I prefer a flip-flopper. At
least he thinks for himself.
----

http://www.curlesneck.com
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Giftzwerg" <giftzwerg999@NOSPAMZ.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d6b93b22658515298a4e1@news-east.giganews.com...
> In article <ert2g1th2iq3i2vq6lm8rik2t6hqjqbh73@4ax.com>,
> not@thistime.net says...
>
> > > in the world of gifty $50 for a wargame is a sin. $50 for a tank of
gas is
> > >good.
> > >
> > And invading another country to steal THEIR petroleum is even better!
>
> Here's a clue[1] for you, dumbass; when you "steal" something, you get
> it for free.
>

hey dumbass, the oil companies are and have been making record profits.
they and their minions bush and cheney , didn't do it so we could have cheap
gas they did it so thay could make more money.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"Giftzwerg" <giftzwerg999@NOSPAMZ.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d6b967951bef58a98a4e3@news-east.giganews.com...
> In article <btt2g1pg69csvof41is0st4ug4qg0ejjq0@4ax.com>,
> not@thistime.net says...
>
> > >Considering that he was re-elected, I can't wait for the "toughtful -
> > >post-Bush era analysis" about why the guy who invaded the one country
out of
> > >three with the lowest possibility to have WMD (a roll of 1-2 on a
six-sided
> > >die - I hope he didn't choose the result by hand) was considered bright
> > >enough to have a second go.
> >
> > It's far more likely that The Shrub (a junior bush) is a complaisant
> > sock-puppet for the far more dangerous intelligent conspirators
> > against democratic processes who prefer to act from the shadows.
>
> <laughter>
>
> The Bilderburgers, perhaps? Skull And Bones? The Trilateral
> Commission?
>
> Or do The Grays have their fine, Byzantine hands in it ... again?
>

big oil gifty.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <98SdnbsCFfVJu5_eRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, roh@comcast.net says...

> > > And invading another country to steal THEIR petroleum is even better!
> >
> > Here's a clue[1] for you, dumbass; when you "steal" something, you get
> > it for free.
> >
>
> hey dumbass, the oil companies are and have been making record profits.

Exactly. They "are and have been." Fat oil company profits are not
exactly something new.

> they and their minions bush and cheney , didn't do it so we could have cheap
> gas they did it so thay could make more money.

Bush and Cheney are making more money? Because of oil prices?

Cite?

--
Giftzwerg
***
"I would have asked the Congress for authority to use
force if Saddam did not allow the inspectors back in,
or did not cooperate with them, or we found weapons
of mass destruction. Because he never did anything he
wasn=3Ft forced to do, at least in my experience."
- Bill Clinton
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

In article <rLGdnZsjJ-6Qup_eRVn-3g@comcast.com>, roh@comcast.net says...

> > > >Considering that he was re-elected, I can't wait for the "toughtful -
> > > >post-Bush era analysis" about why the guy who invaded the one country
> out of
> > > >three with the lowest possibility to have WMD (a roll of 1-2 on a
> six-sided
> > > >die - I hope he didn't choose the result by hand) was considered bright
> > > >enough to have a second go.
> > >
> > > It's far more likely that The Shrub (a junior bush) is a complaisant
> > > sock-puppet for the far more dangerous intelligent conspirators
> > > against democratic processes who prefer to act from the shadows.
> >
> > <laughter>
> >
> > The Bilderburgers, perhaps? Skull And Bones? The Trilateral
> > Commission?
> >
> > Or do The Grays have their fine, Byzantine hands in it ... again?
> >
>
> big oil gifty.

Cite?

--
Giftzwerg
***
"I would have asked the Congress for authority to use
force if Saddam did not allow the inspectors back in,
or did not cooperate with them, or we found weapons
of mass destruction. Because he never did anything he
wasn=3Ft forced to do, at least in my experience."
- Bill Clinton
 

jp

Distinguished
Apr 1, 2004
523
0
18,980
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

"ray o'hara" <roh@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:98SdnbsCFfVJu5_eRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
>
> "Giftzwerg" <giftzwerg999@NOSPAMZ.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1d6b93b22658515298a4e1@news-east.giganews.com...
> > In article <ert2g1th2iq3i2vq6lm8rik2t6hqjqbh73@4ax.com>,
> > not@thistime.net says...
> >
> > > > in the world of gifty $50 for a wargame is a sin. $50 for a tank of
> gas is
> > > >good.
> > > >
> > > And invading another country to steal THEIR petroleum is even better!
> >
> > Here's a clue[1] for you, dumbass; when you "steal" something, you get
> > it for free.
> >
>
> hey dumbass, the oil companies are and have been making record profits.
> they and their minions bush and cheney , didn't do it so we could have
cheap
> gas they did it so thay could make more money.



Gee, and here everyone else in the world attributes the rising costs to
the demand from developing nations in SE Asia, especially China.




















>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.war-historical (More info?)

Epi Watkins wrote:
>>>As to why, it's because we study history, too and we're still working
>>>towards the historical inevitability of the victory of the socialist
>>>dialectic. That's why. So that we can resist the oppression of the
>>>plutocrats and oligarchs.
>>
>>ROTFLMAO! (Thanks for the knee-slapping laugh!) :)
>>
>>[I hereby nominate your post for Most Humorous of the Month]
>
>
> Well...you're obviously wrong about something. Liberals do like
> wargames after all.
>

I never said they didn't; what I asked was why? But before you launch
into some vitriolic (un-liberal!) screed, please be aware that my
original question was laced with a good bit of humor.

Go plant some flowers, freak! ;-)