Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:09:54 -0400, me@privacy.net wrote
(in article <ao8id1hvs2pi6d6jik5dng9rrnbka8qv7n@4ax.com> ):
> Subject: Motorola Razor a good smart phone?
> From: me@privacy.net
> Date: Yesterday 11:09 AM
> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
>
> Is the Razor considered to be a "smart" phone?
>
> If yes.... is the Treo 650 still a better smart phone
> than it is?
No, the RAZR is not considered a smart-phone. It is however a decent phone.
:-)
Generally speaking your smart-phones will have an OS such as PalmOS, Windows
Mobile, or Symbian. (The most recent releases of Blackberry would also fall
into this category.)
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
me@privacy.net wrote:
> Is the Razor considered to be a "smart" phone?
It's a phone with some PIM functionailty, but is not a Smart phone in
the same sense as a WIndows Mobile or PalmOS device. it's more like a
regualr phone.
> If yes.... is the Treo 650 still a better smart phone
> than it is?
Yes.
--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)
>It's a phone with some PIM functionailty, but is not a Smart phone in
>the same sense as a WIndows Mobile or PalmOS device. it's more like a
>regualr phone.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.