<A HREF="http://www.techwarelabs.com/reviews/memory/memory_timings/index.shtml" target="_new">Making it clickable.</A>
The article is good, but not great.
There are a lot of other things that they could have done with it. One question is why did they use an older chipset? Why did they go back to a 100MHz base signal and not start with 133MHz and then include a 200MHz signal? Those are questions that I will not get an answer to.
As for your motherboard tiran, you have a totally different scenario. First off you are using a totally different chipset. The i875P is known to not be friendly to more aggressive memory latency settings.
So all of the information from the Techwarelabs article is about 90% useless to to. Basically all you can do with it is to learn about different timing latencies.
As I stated before, the i875's MCH is not happy with tighter timings.
<A HREF="http://www.intel.com/technology/memory/ddr/valid/dimm_results.htm" target="_new">Here is a listing of the validated unbuffered memory modules for the i875.</A>
You will notice that for the CAS Latency settings the modules were between 2.5T (cycles="T") and 3T.
The best timing from any module was a 2.5T CL, 3T tRCD, and 3T tRP. The worst was 3-4-4.
One thing that you will not find on the Intel website is the configuration of the other latency settings. For most Intel chipsets it needs a CMD timing of 2T or higher. This can be set lower but you can start encountering stability problems. There are also Page Hit Limit (PH) problems with the i875 in Dual mode. In single mode the i875 can have 32 pages open but in dual mode it can only have 16 pages open at one time. This can kill performance in terms of missed pages. That in combination with a CMD set too low is brutal.
As for your question about "All i concluded from reading on the internet is that i will gain Very small gain when i invest on those "special" / "high speed" memory. Am i right?"
That is not entirely true. Memory frequency is still the most important factor in terms of performance gains within specific memory architectures. (RDRAM, DDRSDRAM, QDRSRAM, etc.)
The total performance gains from memory timings are tiny compared to the ones gained from frequency increases.
And for your "have you measured a performance gain when you switched from CAS3 regular / slow memory to CAS2 HyperX etc memory ?"
At higher frequency speeds, the increases from lower latency settings are diminished. This is because each cycle duration becomes shorter and shorter. 133MHz is 133 million cycles per second. 166MHz is 166 million cycles per second. So you can see that 33 million more cycles occur in the same timeframe and thus each individual cycle is taking less time to take place. And if the individual cycle is shorter so is the penalty from each latency cycle.
If you are not intending to overclock, standard settings are going to be more than sufficient for you. Just set your BIOS settings to "SPD". The SPD is a chip on your memory modules that contain the specifications of that module. SPD stands for Serial Presence Detect. The MCH sends out a signal and gets this information back from the modules. The BIOS then runs the memory at those specifications.
<A HREF="http://www.millionmanlan.com/MMLDefault.asp" target="_new">Gaming the THG way... THG sponsors the MML2: June 25-29, 2003 in Louisville Kentucky... Be there!</A>