Nothing was really decided today except to prolong a decision...personally I think it is nuts that the company
NTF did not settle for 500 million..Isn't NTF just a couple
of people?
I could live quite nicely on 500 million and do alot
of good things for this world with that kind of money.
I really think NTF is just greedy....Is it worth to upset
and stop a good thing like this when you are offered this
much money?
I agree that NTF should get a very good settlement Because it was their patent....I just think they should of taken the 500 million..
Put 5 million in an interest bearing account at 15%...take the interest every month for themsevlves to live on...take 495 million and help some people out...
The judge hearing a patent-dispute case against the maker of the BlackBerry device gave both sides time to settle the case, a relief to users of the text-messaging handheld computer who feared a court-ordered shutdown.
Fans of the addictive BlackBerries, sometimes called "Crackberries," worried the judge would shut down the service within 30 days, as requested by NTP Inc., a small patent-holding company in Arlington, Va. NTP won a lawsuit for patent infringement in 2002 against Research in Motion, the maker of BlackBerries.
Research in Motion has said it has a backup plan in case of a shutdown.
Separately, Research in Motion said Friday the U.S. Patent Office has rejected the patents at the heart of the lawsuit.
David Roodman, partner and co-chairman of the intellectual property group at the St. Louis-based law firm Bryan Cave LLP, said Friday's decision shows "the court's effort to provide the parties with one more opportunity to try to resolve the dispute among themselves."
U.S. District Judge James R. Spencer's decision will likely come within three to six weeks, said Lance Johnson, partner with Washington law firm Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman LLP, who is familiar with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
BlackBerry communication devices are used by emergency response personnel, corporate executives, consumers and government agencies, including homeland security officials.
Jim Balsillie, Research in Motion chairman and co-chief executive, said through a spokesman Friday that the company demonstrated in court that an injunction would harm the public interest.
Balsillie also said the patent office should never have issued the patents at the heart of the case. "As of today, all of the patents remaining in dispute have also been rejected by the patent office re-examination team," Balsillie said.
NTP can appeal the decision within the patent office. NTP did not return phone calls seeking comment.
Despite the decision by the patent office, the case will likely continue in court, as the courts and patent office consider different criteria and burdens of proof, Roodman said.
But the rejection of the patents puts more pressure on NTP, Roodman said, adding that both companies "are playing a game of time here and playing every card that they have."
Another case could affect this dispute. Next month, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in MercExchange LLC v. eBay, which will determine when it's appropriate to issue injunctions in patent-infringement cases.
