It is true that the new DDR modules (dual-channel) surpass the 1066 RDRAM modules in bandwidth, but the frequency is over 2x greater! The RDRAM PC that I built surpasses many DDR comps with the simular characteristics.
My object is to start a friendly debate, but my point is why is the computer market steering away from RDRAM. RDRAM still has tremendous potential! While DDR has no potential, its like trying to make 56K faster. Where can DDR go beyond dual-channel? quad-channel(korny joke)?
I would like to see more RDRAM and more RDRAM chipsets, and I would like to see an RDRAM, AMD board/chipset.
"The people don't know, the government can't."
-Vladimir Lenin
My object is to start a friendly debate, but my point is why is the computer market steering away from RDRAM. RDRAM still has tremendous potential! While DDR has no potential, its like trying to make 56K faster. Where can DDR go beyond dual-channel? quad-channel(korny joke)?
I would like to see more RDRAM and more RDRAM chipsets, and I would like to see an RDRAM, AMD board/chipset.
"The people don't know, the government can't."
-Vladimir Lenin