Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from the
audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
(This came up in a conversation the other day...)
--
Dave Martin
Java Jive Studio
Nashville, TN
www.javajivestudio.com
In article <BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
Dave Martin <dmainc@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from the
>audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
Yes, and you lose about 10dB.
BUT, if you open the thing up, you'll find that there is a feedback pot
on the "tubessence" circuit that you can crank up or down for more or
less effect. Just adjusting that might be a start.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
"Dave Martin" <dmainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from the
> audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
> (This came up in a conversation the other day...)
> --
> Dave Martin
> Java Jive Studio
> Nashville, TN
> www.javajivestudio.com >
>
"Dave Martin" <dmainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from the
> audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
> (This came up in a conversation the other day...)
> --
> Dave Martin
> Java Jive Studio
> Nashville, TN
> www.javajivestudio.com >
>
which model? 100? 207?
"Dave Martin" <dmainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from the
> audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
> (This came up in a conversation the other day...)
> --
> Dave Martin
> Java Jive Studio
> Nashville, TN
> www.javajivestudio.com
On Sun, 15 May 2005 21:30:09 -0400, Dave Martin wrote
(in article <BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> ):
> Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from the
> audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
> (This came up in a conversation the other day...)
>
The Aphex 1100 preamp is pretty damn clear. I'm assuming you're referring to
other models?
Ty Ford
-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com
"TimPerry" <timperry@noaspamadelphia.net> wrote in message
news:3qWdnWgy4oS_mhXfRVn-qA@adelphia.com...
>
> "Dave Martin" <dmainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> > Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from
the
> > audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
> > (This came up in a conversation the other day...)
> which model? 100? 207?
>
I'm thinking that it's either a 107 or 207 (It's not my preamp).
"Scott Dorsey" <kludge@panix.com> wrote in message
news6907f$dgr$1@panix2.panix.com...
> In article <BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> Dave Martin <dmainc@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from
the
> >audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
>
> Yes, and you lose about 10dB.
>
> BUT, if you open the thing up, you'll find that there is a feedback pot
> on the "tubessence" circuit that you can crank up or down for more or
> less effect. Just adjusting that might be a start.
> --scott
>
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Thanks, Scott - I figured that you'd know if anyone would. I'll pass the
information along....
"Ty Ford" <tyreeford@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:RJ6dnXs4WdV3XhXfRVn-rw@comcast.com...
> On Sun, 15 May 2005 21:30:09 -0400, Dave Martin wrote
> (in article <BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> ):
>
> > Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from
the
> > audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
> > (This came up in a conversation the other day...)
> >
>
> The Aphex 1100 preamp is pretty damn clear. I'm assuming you're referring
to
> other models?
>
I believe that this is a107- the ones that were marketed a few years back
as having 'real tube warmth'.
"David Morgan (MAMS)" <mams@NOSPAm-a-m-s.com> wrote in message
newsSThe.2719$rI1.2629@trnddc02...
>
> "Dave Martin" <dmainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> > Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from
the
> > audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
> > (This came up in a conversation the other day...)
>
> Just get an 1100, Dave. ;-)
>
Honest, Dave - it's not mine. I'm, er... asking for a friend.
On Mon, 16 May 2005 16:31:26 -0400, Dave Martin wrote
(in article <yq7ie.5780$w21.4025@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net> ):
> "Ty Ford" <tyreeford@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:RJ6dnXs4WdV3XhXfRVn-rw@comcast.com...
>> On Sun, 15 May 2005 21:30:09 -0400, Dave Martin wrote
>> (in article <BIShe.2112$M36.977@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> ):
>>
>>> Is there any way to remove the tube (and its associated 'warmth') from
> the
>>> audio circuit of the Aphex Tubescence preamps to make the useable?
>>> (This came up in a conversation the other day...)
>>>
>>
>> The Aphex 1100 preamp is pretty damn clear. I'm assuming you're referring
> to
>> other models?
>>
> I believe that this is a107- the ones that were marketed a few years back
> as having 'real tube warmth'.
>
>
Right. Just making the point that the Aphex 1100 is not in the same league as
the lower 107, 207. Some folks seem to think that they are all similar.
Aphex makes at least one other premium preamp that comes as eight remote
controllable pres. I don't recall the model number at the moment.
Regards,
Ty Ford
-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com
Ty Ford wrote:
>
> Right. Just making the point that the Aphex 1100 is not in the same league as
> the lower 107, 207. Some folks seem to think that they are all similar.
Yes, just like a DBX 786 compared to a 386. Or A Focusrite Red compared
to the Platinum series. The same in name only.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.