"Matrixmusic" <kevindoylemusic@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:1116823652.294209.295460@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Any suggestion guys.
> I want to mix 24 bit-48khz.
> It's solo voice with Orchestra.
> Kevin
>
Hi Kevin,
I'm not totally sure what you are asking.
Are you mixing from an analog source ( mixer? ) and want an A/D converter to
record your final stereo mix to a digital format? Or do you want 4 to 48
channels of A/D so you can record all of the individual tracks initially to
digital but you want the converters to be as good as possible so that when
you mix it turns out well?
You might want to give us a hint at your budget, especially if the latter
scenario is the correct one. In either case I would think that he Lavry
Engineering Blue series converters would do an outstanding job for you.
In article <1116823652.294209.295460@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Matrixmusic <kevindoylemusic@rogers.com> wrote:
>Any suggestion guys.
>I want to mix 24 bit-48khz.
>It's solo voice with Orchestra.
I'd look at the Prism and Lavry stuff, as well as the Weiss.
The Grimm box sounded pretty amazing to be with a DSD output, but I
don't know if they have got the PCM output module for it finished yet.
Meitner's converters might also be worth listening to.
The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from
is the Studer D19.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Lorin David Schultz <Lorin@DAMNSPAM!v5v.ca> wrote:
>"Scott Dorsey" <kludge@panix.com> wrote:
>>
>> The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from
>> is the Studer D19.
>
>Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer?
I don't know, it just didn't sound good. Stuff going in and coming out just
wound up sounding flatter and duller on the other end. The noise floor was not
even, either.
It was a real disappointment because the modular interfaces made it really
very versatile... you can configure it in all kinds of ways for different
applications. The routing and SRC modules looked very handy, and the ability
to deal with a wide variety of interfaces, even older ones like MADI, is
very slick.
It just didn't sound good.
Incidentally, I am talking about the real D19 rack system, and not the
D19 MicValve, which is completely unrelated. The D19 MicValve also sounds
bad, but for different reasons.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
"Scott Dorsey" <kludge@panix.com> wrote in message
news7ch2p$m7u$1@panix2.panix.com...
> Lorin David Schultz <Lorin@DAMNSPAM!v5v.ca> wrote:
> >"Scott Dorsey" <kludge@panix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from
> >> is the Studer D19.
> >
> >Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer?
>
> I don't know, it just didn't sound good. Stuff going in and coming out
just
> wound up sounding flatter and duller on the other end. The noise floor
was not
> even, either.
>
> It was a real disappointment because the modular interfaces made it really
> very versatile... you can configure it in all kinds of ways for different
> applications. The routing and SRC modules looked very handy, and the
ability
> to deal with a wide variety of interfaces, even older ones like MADI, is
> very slick.
>
> It just didn't sound good.
>
> Incidentally, I am talking about the real D19 rack system, and not the
> D19 MicValve, which is completely unrelated. The D19 MicValve also sounds
> bad, but for different reasons.
> --scott
Can you compare them to the converters in the V-Eight?
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.