Archived from groups: microsoft.public.games.zone.simulation (
More info?)
You've got it right... some is better, some is worse,
some is VERY good, some is horrid. Keep trying new stuff,
throw out the junk.
s -------------------------------------------------------
>-----Original Message-----
>Hi-
>
>I tried some free ware scenery add-ons and was
>disappointed that my video display almost "jerked" to a
>halt when my plane approached the new scenery add-on
>area. The default scenery works flawlessly.
>
>I took this to mean that I don't have enough computer
>power for new scenery add-ons. Is my thinking correct? Or
>is some scenery designed better than others?
>
>Regards...
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Thanks..I'd better contact publisher..also thanks for
>>info on Venice, etc.>-----Original Message-----
>>>Tom -
>>>The first question is, do you see ANY difference?
>>>If not, you may not have the add-on scenery correctly
>>>loaded, such as, not at the correct priority level.
>>>If you do see SOME difference, but not much... don't be
>>>surprized. I've installed LOTS of stuff, and then
>>removed
>>>it because it's just ho-hum. On the oppposite side of
>>the
>>>coin, SOME of it is excellent. As an example, Lago's
>>>scenery for Venice is superb... yet their add-on for the
>>>area around Florence is just so-so.
>>>hth - s ------------------------------------------------
>-
>>-
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>I recently purchased REAL SCENE-2004,... hoping to
>>>>enhance MFS 2002,2004.
>>>>I cannot see any improvement after installation.
>>>>Has anyone any experience with this and able to help?
>>>>Thanking ahead.
>>>>Tom
>>>>.
>>>>
>>>.
>>>
>>.
>>
>.
>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram