does anyone know if it would be possible to feed a pair of passive ADAM
NF-10 with a Sansui B-55 hi-fi amp? The problem is that the NF-10 are 4 ohm
and the B-55 accepts 8 or 16 ohm loads. Is there a way I could do this?
In article <SeZqe.146450$IN.2531684@twister2.libero.it> daniele@nonstaqui.com writes:
> does anyone know if it would be possible to feed a pair of passive ADAM
> NF-10 with a Sansui B-55 hi-fi amp? The problem is that the NF-10 are 4 ohm
> and the B-55 accepts 8 or 16 ohm loads. Is there a way I could do this?
Those are just rough guidelines. Just don't push the volume and it'll
probably work OK. But start saving your pennies for a more suitable
amplifier.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
Daniele <daniele@nonstaqui.com> wrote:
>
>does anyone know if it would be possible to feed a pair of passive ADAM
>NF-10 with a Sansui B-55 hi-fi amp? The problem is that the NF-10 are 4 ohm
>and the B-55 accepts 8 or 16 ohm loads. Is there a way I could do this?
You _could_ do it with an autotransformer. EV makes one that costs
around $120/channel. Frankly it would be cheaper and sound better just
to get an amp that is up to the job.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1118607791k@trad...
> Those are just rough guidelines. Just don't push the volume and it'll
> probably work OK. But start saving your pennies for a more suitable
> amplifier.
Thanks Mike, I think I'll do that until I have the money for something like
the Hafler "P" series which I noticed gets recommended a lot here.
"Scott Dorsey" <kludge@panix.com> wrote in message
news8k67l$n68$1@panix2.panix.com...
> You _could_ do it with an autotransformer. EV makes one that costs
> around $120/channel. Frankly it would be cheaper and sound better just
> to get an amp that is up to the job.
Thanks Scott, that's what it seems to me too. If I can get away with it for
now I'll use the Sansui the way Mike has suggested (I'll try to be very
careful with volume).
>> does anyone know if it would be possible to feed a pair
>> of passive ADAM NF-10 with a Sansui B-55 hi-fi amp?
Yes.
>> The problem is that the NF-10 are 4 ohm and the B-55
>> accepts 8 or 16 ohm loads. Is there a way I could do this?
Standard loudspeaker cable.
> You _could_ do it with an autotransformer.
Scott, the B-55 is a strange amp, as I recall its powerspec it has no
more power in 4 ohms than in 8 ohms, quite possibly less. I have two,
they were on sale in the mid 1980'ties. I bought one, tested on the
KEF's and found it good and went and got another and I have been
regretting ever since that I didn't get a third too. Like the current
Cambridge dual ""60 watt"" amp it is a lot better at not having to
bother with bass, for the very same reason: there is not much and
possibly less capacitance in the psu than in some preamp designs.
A simple mod to the B-55 is to remove the frequency analysis display,
the sound gets remarkably cleaner. I use mine with compression drivers
and hardly ever reach the one watt indication. The power metering LED's
remain functional with the analyser pcb physically removed. I also
replaced the input coupling cap with a smaller polypropylene cap and
replaced the DC servo opamp with a 275, since the guy who helped me said
that he had heard it mentioned that such servo opamps could matter. The
logic of that defies my understanding but it was easy and fast to do
with the critters in surgery anyway.
The total mod took them from good to very very good and they are so
wonderfully clean when not at all delivering power - midrange amp output
0.65 volts at 1 volt in at the attenuator box. Yep - the midrange amp
overall is functionally an attenuator, but one with a very low output
impedance.
> EV makes one that costs around $120/channel. Frankly it would
> be cheaper and sound better just to get an amp that is up to the job.
I agree in this context, this amp will get loose and sloppy in the bass
if having to work hard in a 4 Ohm load. What this amp excels uniquely at
is to do near nothing, not very many amps are good at that discipline.
> --scott
Kind regards
Peter Larsen
--
*******************************************
* My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
* The Vienna Copyright convention applies *
*******************************************
Peter Larsen <SPAMSHIELD_plarsen@mail.tele.dk> wrote:
>
>Scott, the B-55 is a strange amp, as I recall its powerspec it has no
>more power in 4 ohms than in 8 ohms, quite possibly less.
This is the sign of an undersized power supply.
>I have two,
>they were on sale in the mid 1980'ties. I bought one, tested on the
>KEF's and found it good and went and got another and I have been
>regretting ever since that I didn't get a third too. Like the current
>Cambridge dual ""60 watt"" amp it is a lot better at not having to
>bother with bass, for the very same reason: there is not much and
>possibly less capacitance in the psu than in some preamp designs.
That also sounds like an undersized power supply.
>A simple mod to the B-55 is to remove the frequency analysis display,
>the sound gets remarkably cleaner.
That is even scarier.
>I agree in this context, this amp will get loose and sloppy in the bass
>if having to work hard in a 4 Ohm load. What this amp excels uniquely at
>is to do near nothing, not very many amps are good at that discipline.
That's what Class A amplification is for!
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
> Peter Larsen <SPAMSHIELD_plarsen@mail.tele.dk> wrote:
>> Scott, the B-55 is a strange amp, as I recall its powerspec
>> it has no more power in 4 ohms than in 8 ohms, quite possibly
>> less.
> This is the sign of an undersized power supply.
I agree, and it is why it is not an optimum choice for the intended use,
even though well sounding ex works.
>> A simple mod to the B-55 is to remove the frequency analysis
>> display, the sound gets remarkably cleaner.
> That is even scarier.
It is a fluorescent display. Some DAT's and CD players have the option
to turn off similar displays with a similar gain in quality. No
soldering is required to remove that display, a couple of screws and
pulling a connection. Not scary.
>> I agree in this context, this amp will get loose and sloppy
>> in the bass if having to work hard in a 4 Ohm load. What
>> this amp excels uniquely at is to do near nothing, not very
>> many amps are good at that discipline.
> That's what Class A amplification is for!
And being the last burp from the quality wars, but badly afflicted from
cost saving, the Sansui B55 happens to be a "New class A" amp with
variable power supply voltage. It is not good at playing disco-dance in
4 ohms, but it is very good at providing signal to a compression driver,
which is what I use them for and it is also potentially useful in other
multi-amp contexts. Space, clarity and silence are all OK.
> --scott
Kind regards
Peter Larsen
--
*******************************************
* My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
* The Vienna Copyright convention applies *
*******************************************
Peter Larsen <SPAMSHIELD_plarsen@mail.tele.dk> wrote:
>Scott Dorsey wrote:
>
>>> A simple mod to the B-55 is to remove the frequency analysis
>>> display, the sound gets remarkably cleaner.
>
>> That is even scarier.
>
>It is a fluorescent display. Some DAT's and CD players have the option
>to turn off similar displays with a similar gain in quality. No
>soldering is required to remove that display, a couple of screws and
>pulling a connection. Not scary.
It's scary. Yes, all the Radio Systems mixing boards have the same problem.
Yes, if you change the bargraph on the front of the Broadcast Engineering
FM exciters from line to dot mode the distortion drops by an order of
magnitude.
But it's NOT acceptable in a well-designed product. My mother always said
that just because other kids did it, that doesn't make it right.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.