Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Connect AES3 to SPDIF (Roland SRV-3030D)

Connect AES3 to SPDIF (Roland SRV-3030D)

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - Connect AES3 to SPDIF (Roland SRV-3030D)

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Hi.
I have a Roland SRV-3030D that has RCA type SPDIF connections for in and
out. I also have a MOTU 1224 with AES/EBU XLR In/Out.

I would like to connect the two digitally using these connections.

The Roland manual states that the 3030D can accept AES/EBU connections (does
that mean without modification). It also says that (paraphrasing) "Some
digital audio devices using AES/EBU make use of XLR connectors (as the Motu
does). Connections to such devices require use of a third party adapter."
Additionally I saw that is says the digital input and output are 75 Ohms
unbalanced with Electrical Characteristics RS-422A.

Now, I am confused. Does this mean I can make a straight connection as long
as the connector types match the device on each end, or does this mean I
need some sort of adapter for impedance matching? I would try a direct
connection but I don't currently have any compatible cables.

I found this document (http://www.rane.com/note149.html), but I am not an
electrical engineer and I am not sure if I need to do this kind of thing. At
the bottom there is a figure illustrating AES3 to SPDIF and visa versa.

So, Does the Roland really accept a direct AES/EBU signal, unmodified, or am
I misunderstanding. What do I need to do to connect these two units
digitally?

Thanks for the assistance.
Clay

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Clay LaHatte" <lahatte@vicksburg.com> wrote:
> So, Does the Roland really accept a direct AES/EBU signal,
> unmodified, or am I misunderstanding. What do I need to do to connect
> these two units digitally?




I didn't understand what the Roland manual was trying to say, but it
doesn't really matter. You have three options.

1. Just connect it directly and see what happens. Use an XLR to RCA
adaptor cable (or an RCA cable with an XLR adaptor on one end). Pin 2
of the XLR should go to the centre pin of the RCA. Pin 1 of the XLR
goes to the sleeve of the RCA. Pin 3 of the XLR goes nowhere. Chances
are better than even that it will work,and it's unlikely to cause any
damage. If it doesn't work, see below.

2. All kinds of companies make active devices for converting AES/EBU to
S/PDIF and vice versa. They're expensive, but they work.

3. Canare and a couple other companies make inline transformers that
convert back and forth. They're passive so you don't need a power
supply, and at about $50 each they're cheaper than active converter
boxes. I've yet to hear of a case where one of these didn't work.

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <damg74$7a7$1@nntp.usace.army.mil> lahatte@vicksburg.com writes:

> The Roland manual states that the 3030D can accept AES/EBU connections (does
> that mean without modification). It also says that (paraphrasing) "Some
> digital audio devices using AES/EBU make use of XLR connectors (as the Motu
> does). Connections to such devices require use of a third party adapter."
> Additionally I saw that is says the digital input and output are 75 Ohms
> unbalanced with Electrical Characteristics RS-422A.
>
> Now, I am confused. Does this mean I can make a straight connection as long
> as the connector types match the device on each end, or does this mean I
> need some sort of adapter for impedance matching? I would try a direct
> connection but I don't currently have any compatible cables.

Maybe, to both. What the Roland manual is saying is that the digital
inputs and outputs are unbalanced, 75 ohms. AES/EBU is balanced, and
110 ohms. But what's true and what they don't say is that the audio
data format is the same for both, and that the Roland 3030 doesn't
care about the status bits that differentiate the professional and
consumer formats.

There is a difference in the voltage level of the two signals which
may be a problem or maybe not. The impedance makes a difference with
long cables but doesn't matter much with short cables.

So, as Lorin says, just try it with physical adapters first, but make
sure that they're wired so that you actually get signal where it's
supposed to be. The RCA plugs should be connected so that the center
conductor goes to Pin 2 of the XLR, and the shield goes to pin 3 and
(optionally) to pin 1.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Hi.
Thanks for the replies. That's some information I needed.

Are there any special type of connectors I need to for digital, or can I use
standard audio connectors and make do.

I assume I can just cut a good video cable with RCA connectors and attach an
XLR to one end.

Clay.

"Clay LaHatte" <lahatte@vicksburg.com> wrote in message
news:damg74$7a7$1@nntp.usace.army.mil...
> Hi.
> I have a Roland SRV-3030D that has RCA type SPDIF connections for in and
> out. I also have a MOTU 1224 with AES/EBU XLR In/Out.
>
> I would like to connect the two digitally using these connections.
>
> The Roland manual states that the 3030D can accept AES/EBU connections
(does
> that mean without modification). It also says that (paraphrasing) "Some
> digital audio devices using AES/EBU make use of XLR connectors (as the
Motu
> does). Connections to such devices require use of a third party adapter."
> Additionally I saw that is says the digital input and output are 75 Ohms
> unbalanced with Electrical Characteristics RS-422A.
>
> Now, I am confused. Does this mean I can make a straight connection as
long
> as the connector types match the device on each end, or does this mean I
> need some sort of adapter for impedance matching? I would try a direct
> connection but I don't currently have any compatible cables.
>
> I found this document (http://www.rane.com/note149.html), but I am not an
> electrical engineer and I am not sure if I need to do this kind of thing.
At
> the bottom there is a figure illustrating AES3 to SPDIF and visa versa.
>
> So, Does the Roland really accept a direct AES/EBU signal, unmodified, or
am
> I misunderstanding. What do I need to do to connect these two units
> digitally?
>
> Thanks for the assistance.
> Clay
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

By the way, I found these items. So, I guess if a direct cable connection
won't do it, I can try these things...

http://www.westlake-electronic.com [...] BCJ-XP-TRB

https://www.digitalconnection.com/s [...] de=BNCXRCA

Now, I just need to find a couple of decent 16ft digital cables.

Clay

"Clay LaHatte" <lahatte@vicksburg.com> wrote in message
news:damg74$7a7$1@nntp.usace.army.mil...
> Hi.
> I have a Roland SRV-3030D that has RCA type SPDIF connections for in and
> out. I also have a MOTU 1224 with AES/EBU XLR In/Out.
>
> I would like to connect the two digitally using these connections.
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <U_SdnVcuiarh6lLfRVn-1A@canufly.net> lahatte@vicksburg.com writes:

> Are there any special type of connectors I need to for digital, or can I use
> standard audio connectors and make do.

For your purposes, any connectors that fit will work just fine.

> I assume I can just cut a good video cable with RCA connectors and attach an
> XLR to one end.

You might do better, since this is your first time, by cutting up a
good audio cable with RCA connectors rather than a good video cable.
Some video cable is built with a foam dialectric and very thin wires
(for low capacitance, hence low loss) and it may be difficult to
solder.

But don't use too good of an audio cable or it might be built in a
similar manner. You can't tell until you cut it.

Alternately, you can buy a pre-made adapter. You want a Switchcraft
322 (XLR female) or 324 (XLR male) which adapts the XLR to an RCA
jack. Plug that into the unit with the XLR, and then connect the two
units with an RCA-RCA cable. You can use a video cable for this if you
want to be nice to your signal.

Those adapters are constructed so you can take it apart by loosening
just one screw and you can see how it's wired, and modify it if by
some chance they're wired with pin 2 or pin 3 not connected. Some
older gear used XLRs for unbalanced connections and wired only two
pins, sometimes the wrong two pins.

Don't use adapters that go the other way so you'd have to plug the RCA
end of the adapter into a chassis mounted RCA jack. The adapter and
cable are too heavy and the plug will fall out.


You can order the adapters ($10.49) from Markertek:

http://www.markertek.com/SearchPro [...] &sort=prod



--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Mike Rivers" wrote ...
> You might do better, since this is your first time, by cutting up a
> good audio cable with RCA connectors rather than a good video cable.
> Some video cable is built with a foam dialectric and very thin wires
> (for low capacitance, hence low loss) and it may be difficult to
> solder.
>
> But don't use too good of an audio cable or it might be built in a
> similar manner. You can't tell until you cut it.
>
> Alternately, you can buy a pre-made adapter. You want a Switchcraft
> 322 (XLR female) or 324 (XLR male) which adapts the XLR to an RCA
> jack. Plug that into the unit with the XLR, and then connect the two
> units with an RCA-RCA cable. You can use a video cable for this if you
> want to be nice to your signal.

Are we recommending interconnecting coaxial (assumed 75
ohms unbalanced) with XLR (110-ohm balanced) without
a balun transformer, etc? In addition to the impedance and
bal/unbal aren't there signal voltage differences as well?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote in message
news:11cvndkrlogs1fe@corp.supernews.com
> "Mike Rivers" wrote ..
..
>> You might do better, since this is your first time, by
>> cutting up a good audio cable with RCA connectors rather
than
>> a good video cable. Some video cable is built with a foam
>> dialectric and very thin wires (for low capacitance,
hence
>> low loss) and it may be difficult to solder.

Mike you didn't mention the real possibility of video cable
with aluminum shield and/or center conductors, with
attendant acute problems with soldering.

My policy is that I treat commercially-made video cables as
whole entities, never to be cut or modified. They either
have the right connectors, or I have the right adaptors, or
I don't use them.

>> Alternately, you can buy a pre-made adapter. You want a
>> Switchcraft 322 (XLR female) or 324 (XLR male) which
adapts
>> the XLR to an RCA jack. Plug that into the unit with the
XLR,
>> and then connect the two units with an RCA-RCA cable. You
can
>> use a video cable for this if you want to be nice to your
>> signal.

AES3 to SP/DIF via ordinary XLR-RCA cable adaptors can be
problematic. The AES3 side is balanced, often with both
signal wires floating. There may or may not be a grounded
center tap on any transformer that might be driving it.
Ordinary XLR-RCA adaptors connect one hot to the center pin
of the RCA, and connect pin 1 to the shield side of the RCA.
This works a lot of the time with analog audio. However,
when connected to a floating balanced source which might be
what the AES3 source is, it results in an open circuit.

The issue is (as usual! :-)) laid out in considerable detail
in a Rane note:

http://www.rane.com/note149.html

> Are we recommending interconnecting coaxial (assumed 75
> ohms unbalanced) with XLR (110-ohm balanced) without
> a balun transformer, etc?

I see this concern quite clearly.

> In addition to the impedance and
> bal/unbal aren't there signal voltage differences as well?

Agreed.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <Mq-dnQ1QJsXoYFLfRVn-ug@comcast.com> arnyk@hotpop.com writes:

> Mike you didn't mention the real possibility of video cable
> with aluminum shield and/or center conductors, with
> attendant acute problems with soldering.

That's what I was thinking of when I mentioned the foam dialectric.
Though I know there's foam cable with braided shield and reasonable
diameter inner conductors, most RF video cable that's easy to buy is
the foam/bonded foil stuff suitable only for crimping on Type F
connectors (which rank very close to mini phone jacks on my least
favorite connector list).

> AES3 to SP/DIF via ordinary XLR-RCA cable adaptors can be
> problematic. The AES3 side is balanced, often with both
> signal wires floating.

This is why you can usually get away with connecting it to an
unbalanced device. Not always, but most of the time. Both AES/EBU and
S/PDIF coax are supposed to have transformer isolated outputs, but
sometimes manufacturers cheat.

> Ordinary XLR-RCA adaptors connect one hot to the center pin
> of the RCA, and connect pin 1 to the shield side of the RCA.
> This works a lot of the time with analog audio. However,
> when connected to a floating balanced source which might be
> what the AES3 source is, it results in an open circuit.

This is why I suggested opening up the adapter to see how it's wired,
and modify it if necessary. I think it was here (or maybe it was
somewhere else where this very same question came up recently) where I
made it clear that the RCA cable needs to go between pins 2 and 3 of
the XLR, with pin 1 being optional.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <11cvndkrlogs1fe@corp.supernews.com> rcrowley7@xprt.net writes:

> Are we recommending interconnecting coaxial (assumed 75
> ohms unbalanced) with XLR (110-ohm balanced) without
> a balun transformer, etc? In addition to the impedance and
> bal/unbal aren't there signal voltage differences as well?

I'm recommending TRYING it before spending money on a transformer. It
almost always works, and if it doesn't, it didn't cost much to try.

--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Mike Rivers" wrote ...
>
> Richard Crowley writes:
>> Are we recommending interconnecting coaxial (assumed 75
>> ohms unbalanced) with XLR (110-ohm balanced) without
>> a balun transformer, etc? In addition to the impedance and
>> bal/unbal aren't there signal voltage differences as well?
>
> I'm recommending TRYING it before spending money on a
> transformer. It almost always works, and if it doesn't, it didn't
> cost much to try.

I like it. Its something I would do myself.

But perhaps it would be better to identify it as a cheap/kludge
alternative rather than an "official" methodology? You never
know who is reading these postings and assuming they are gospel?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote:
>>
>> In addition to the impedance and
>> bal/unbal aren't there signal voltage differences as well?

"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
> AES3 to SP/DIF via ordinary XLR-RCA cable adaptors can be
> problematic.



Yeah, yeah, yeah, and you can't connect a speaker output to an
instrument input either because it won't work, except when it does.
Sometimes the input can handle it.

Yes, there are interface issues between AES/EBU and S/PDIF, but most of
the time it works anyway.

Even if it doesn't, he won't hurt anything by trying. I've never heard
of five volts frying an input designed for one.

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote:
>
> This is why I suggested opening up the adapter to see how it's wired,
> and modify it if necessary. I think it was here (or maybe it was
> somewhere else where this very same question came up recently) where
> I made it clear that the RCA cable needs to go between pins 2 and 3
> of the XLR, with pin 1 being optional.



It was here, in response to my instructions to use pins 2 and 1. I
hadn't thought about the floating output possibility.

Of course, much like your comment about the difficulty of soldering
prefab video cables, sometimes Arny just uses different specifics to
make exactly the same point.

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <11d14c8kj5so062@corp.supernews.com> rcrowley7@xprt.net writes:

> >> Are we recommending interconnecting coaxial (assumed 75
> >> ohms unbalanced) with XLR (110-ohm balanced) without
> >> a balun transformer, etc? In addition to the impedance and
> >> bal/unbal aren't there signal voltage differences as well?

> But perhaps it would be better to identify it as a cheap/kludge
> alternative rather than an "official" methodology? You never
> know who is reading these postings and assuming they are gospel?

My "gospel" is that whaever works correctly is good. However, it's
important to be able to distinguish between "works" and "works
correctly." Either it's going to be wired to get signal to the right
pins or it isn't (and that can be easily fixed if it's wrong). Either
it will have enough level or it won't. If it does, it'll work. If it
doesn't, it won't work at all or the audio will drop out. It might
have more jitter than the "right" way due to standing waves resulting
from the impedance mismatch, but for bedroom studio length cables and
bedroom studio expectations, the difference will be negligable.

So while it may be cheap, it's not always a kludge. It depends on what
you're connecting.



--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Thanks for all the good advise. I'll try to post the results once I get some
cables and adapters.

By the way for those that may not have seen it, I am trying to digitally
connect a Roland SRV-3030D (S/P-DIF) Digital Reverb to a MOTU 1224
(AES/EBU).

Thanks.
Clay

"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1120909116k@trad...
>
> In article <U_SdnVcuiarh6lLfRVn-1A@canufly.net> lahatte@vicksburg.com
writes:
>
> > Are there any special type of connectors I need to for digital, or can I
use
> > standard audio connectors and make do.
>
> For your purposes, any connectors that fit will work just fine.
>
> > I assume I can just cut a good video cable with RCA connectors and
attach an
> > XLR to one end.
>
> You might do better, since this is your first time, by cutting up a
> good audio cable with RCA connectors rather than a good video cable.
> Some video cable is built with a foam dialectric and very thin wires
> (for low capacitance, hence low loss) and it may be difficult to
> solder.
>
> But don't use too good of an audio cable or it might be built in a
> similar manner. You can't tell until you cut it.
>
> Alternately, you can buy a pre-made adapter. You want a Switchcraft
> 322 (XLR female) or 324 (XLR male) which adapts the XLR to an RCA
> jack. Plug that into the unit with the XLR, and then connect the two
> units with an RCA-RCA cable. You can use a video cable for this if you
> want to be nice to your signal.
>
> Those adapters are constructed so you can take it apart by loosening
> just one screw and you can see how it's wired, and modify it if by
> some chance they're wired with pin 2 or pin 3 not connected. Some
> older gear used XLRs for unbalanced connections and wired only two
> pins, sometimes the wrong two pins.
>
> Don't use adapters that go the other way so you'd have to plug the RCA
> end of the adapter into a chassis mounted RCA jack. The adapter and
> cable are too heavy and the plug will fall out.
>
>
> You can order the adapters ($10.49) from Markertek:
>
> http://www.markertek.com/SearchPro [...] &sort=prod
>
>
>
> --
> I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
> However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
> lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
> you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
> and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Connect AES3 to SPDIF (Roland SRV-3030D)
Go to:

There are 550 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them