Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Other Components > How's == SONY == Monitors nowadays ??

How's == SONY == Monitors nowadays ??

Forum CPU & Components : Other Components - How's == SONY == Monitors nowadays ??

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

hey, i was wondering whats up w/SONY monitors nowadays? do they still hold up to the competition? i ve been getting mixed reports lately, some folks are saying SONY monitors are not quite as good as they used to be quality/realiability wise? i was particularly interested in the 410R model myself (the 19" one), how does it compare to top of the line 19" units from viewsonic/hitachi/samsung etc?? how's SONY support by the way? i ve been getting mixed reports in this area especially ;)

thanks!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Let me start off by saying I'm a cheapskate. I also love quality. I buy my monitors refurbished.

I've tried serveral "flat tube" monitors and never been quite impressed. I've found the old Hitachi semi-flat tube with .22mm dot pitch to offer EXTREMELY high image quality. It's been on the market for many years and is still used today in many budget monitors, such as my current Viewsonic A90.

Now, I'm a system refurbisher, and have seen a LOT of monitors. The best FLAT tube images I've seen were using Samsung tubes. I was so impressed by my last batch of Samsung 17" monitors that, had they been 19", I would have traded in my A90!

One of the things that impressed me with these Samsungs is that, although officially supporting only 1600x1200 according to what I read, I could use them at up to 1920x1440 resoltion and still read small fonts! That is, if I got close enough to the monitor, like 4 inches away! 17" is too small to make good use of such high resolutions, but the fact that they worked, and worked well, was amazing!

So there's my recomendations. If you won't be using anything higher than 1600x1200, the old .22mm Hitachi tubes are great. If you need higher resolutions or prefer a completely flat tube, Samsungs would be great as well.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>

Reply to Crashman
- 0 +

im not a big sony fan for anything any more. i stick with viewsonic mostly.

wpdclan.com cs game server - 69.12.5.119:27015

Reply to jihiggs

if u got money, Sony still wastes all companies in the ULTRA-TOP-OF-THE-LINE CRTS, but their mid range is not so pretty.

Proud Owner the Block Heater
120% nVidia Fanboy
PROUD OWNER OF THE GEFORCE FX 5900ULTRA <-- I wish this was me
I'd get a nVidia GeForce FX 5900Ultra... if THEY WOULD CHANGE THAT #()#@ HSF

Reply to coolsquirtle
- 0 +

My bro does a lot of CAD/CAM work. A few years back his work purchased a then top-of-the-line 21" FD Trinitron for him to use at home. He had to send two of them back to CDW because they were very blurry around the edges. The third one was better, but the problem was never totally eliminated. If you look close enough you can still see that text around the edges is a little blurry. Not quite what I would expect from a professional monitor. Personally I have a 17" G200. It is getting pretty old, but the antiglare coating built into the CRT is starting to peel, which is quite annoying. Of course these are just my personal experiences with Sony. I haven't really researched the monitor market lately so I don't have a recommendation on which brand is best ATM.

<font color=white><b>_________________________________________________</font color=white></b>
Armadillo<font color=orange>[</font color=orange><font color=green>TcC</font color=green><font color=orange>]</font color=orange> at Lanwar and MML

Reply to Syndil
- 0 +

Well, i can't say anything about sony, so this may be totally irrelevant, but I just bought a Hitachi 19", CM721F , the black one. It's a totally flat screen, but yes, the text does get blurry around the left bottom edges, where your start menu would be. It's a good monitor, just that little problem, oh well, I guess everything can't be perfect.

Reply to fiask0

i am happy with all 3 of my samsung monitors

2 syncmaster 700nf monitors
1 syncmaster 152t monitor (lcd)

They have an absolutly clear picture...i have had 1 of the 700nf's for 2 years and the other for 1.5 years....and i only have good things to say about samsung.

3 386DX-25's...12 volts...glue some ln2 and a wicked amount of overclocking and you get a willamantee minus 36 pins, 33.75 million transistors and a couple hundred mhz... :cool:

Reply to pIII_Man
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Other Components > How's == SONY == Monitors nowadays ??
Go to:

There are 828 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them