Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (
More info?)
> "Justin Ulysses Morse" <ulyssesnospam@rollmusic.com> wrote:.
> > I don't get it. You want to hear the guitar amp through the tom mikes,
> > but only while the drummer is hitting the toms? And you want the
> > guitar bleed to change tone depending on what drummer is doing?
Zigakly <no@no.no> wrote:
> It's no different from gating toms in the studio. Cymbals ring through tom
> mics, but gating the toms is imperative, despite any disproportional
> bleeding. The previous poster talks about gating the overheads too, now
> that's a dubious notion.
It's a matter of preference and style. To me, NOT gating the toms is
imperative. For the sake of the tom sounds as much as to avoid
modulating the bleed.
> In the studio, maybe, but live, the more you have to work with in post the
> better. In the studio the drums don't start tracking until the drums are in
> the right spot for the room and the right mics are in the right spots.
> Live, the show starts when the show starts.
That's true, and back-ups plans are critical to a successful live show.
I just know from experience (mixing bands on a live radio show for
years, as well as live sound and studio work) that listening critically
takes time, and when you're on a tight schedule it's helpful to limit
how many things you need to critique and reoptimize.
> > > Okay, here is what I do:
> >
> > I would set up an AKG C33 stereo condenser mike at the best-sounding
> > spot in the house. I'd feed it to a stereo recording apparatus and
> > start recording. Then I'd make sure somebody did a fantastic job of
> > mixing FOH that night, so that everybody in the room enjoys the show
> > and the recording sounds like a realistic representation of a really
> > great show. And I would try to relax so I can play my best.
>
> If everyone were angels, we wouldn't need police. If every live recording
> circumstance were even close to ideal, we wouldn't need studios. The need
> to multitrack live performances is no different from the need to multitrack
> drums in the studio. The overheads do most of the work, but not all. Same
> for room mics under even the best live recording conditions. There is no
> one spot in any venue or drum room that has everything.
>
> Plus, a one-point stereo mic lacks depth, and large diaphragm mics lack
> off-axis coherence. His NT5's would be much better suited than a C33 for
> overheads or room mics.
>
> And not everyone plays best when relaxed
All good points. That's what's great about open forums - the OP has a
variety of perspectives here to consider, and agree or disagree as he
sees fit.
I think live albums should try and capture the reality of a very good
live performance. The trick to that isn't to turn the live venue into
a controlled environment and treat it like a recording studio. The
trick is to record lots of shows so you can pick the most successful
recordings of the best performances. Typically, the first hometown
show after returning from a long tour is the best possible scenario -
large fanbase who haven't seen you in a while, and you've had tons of
"rehearsal" in real live situations to get comfortable with the crowd,
the songs, and the tones. But to get a lot of recordings of lots of
shows, you need a simple, relatively hassle-free setup so you're able
to pull it off consistently night after night until you find yourself
having an "on" night on stage while you're also in a good-sounding room
with a good crowd and a good FOH mix.
ulysses