Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > audio interface
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Hiya all
Can anyone tell me the difference between the Delta 1010 And the Delta
1010lt? Apart from ease of use (breakout box) and of course the price??

Does anyone have any advise on what interfaces I should be looking at for 16
inputs: 2x Delta 1010 or 2x PHASE 88 Racks?
Have I missed any options out about the same price range?

Thanks a million

Dylan

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

In article <42e222f3$0$24481$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net> dylan@rattlebox.plus.com writes:

> Can anyone tell me the difference between the Delta 1010 And the Delta
> 1010lt? Apart from ease of use (breakout box) and of course the price??

There are several differences. You can go to the web site and compare
them. Look at the details. See there's anything missing from the cheap
version that you'd miss.

> Does anyone have any advise on what interfaces I should be looking at for 16
> inputs: 2x Delta 1010 or 2x PHASE 88 Racks?
> Have I missed any options out about the same price range?

If you really need 16 channels of I/O, you should probably consider a
better integrated approach. I'd suggest that you look at an RME ADAT
optical I/O card and then get outboard A/D converters that have the
configuration that you need. Mic inputs? Line inputs? Operating level?
Need lots of inputs and only enough outputs to monitor and make
headphone mixes? You have a lot more flexibility when you don't get
everything in one box. For a basic 8-track "recorder" the Delta line
is a good buy. But when things start getting bigger, you really need
to give the total package more thought.

--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Dylan" <dylan@rattlebox.plus.com> wrote in message
news:42e222f3$0$24481$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net

> Can anyone tell me the difference between the Delta 1010
> And the Delta 1010lt? Apart from ease of use (breakout
> box) and of course the price??

They are vastly different devices. The 1010 has balanced
inputs TRS in that breakout box with impedance balanced TRS
outputs, while the cable bundle that comes with the 1010LT
is unbalanced RCA connectors, in and out except for the
first 2 input channels, which are jumperable as either
no-phantom mic inputs, or balanced inputs.

I suspect that the 1010 and the 1010LT share almost no
specific chips in common. OTOH the PCI interface and
converter chips are from the same vendors - Via and AKM.

> anyone have any advise on what interfaces I should
> be looking at for 16 inputs: 2x Delta 1010 or 2x PHASE
> 88 Racks?

Depends what you want to do.

The Deltqa 1010LT is kinda nasty to hook up because the id
for the inputs and outputs is embossed in the plastic grips
on the RCA connectors. Didn't stop me from getting 2!

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Thanks for your responses...

I'm recording a band and want to record the rhythm section live... that's 7
inputs for drums, 1 for bass and 4 for 2 guitars.

I'm recording through my Behringer MX3282A so I'll be using the pre amps in
the desk. I'm still fairly new to PC recording and the simple task of
getting my sounds into my PC seems more complex then I thought! hehe

any advise very welcome

Dylan

Reply to dylan

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Dylan <dylan@rattlebox.plus.com> wrote:
>
>I'm recording a band and want to record the rhythm section live... that's 7
>inputs for drums, 1 for bass and 4 for 2 guitars.

Why seven inputs for drums?

Why two mikes on each guitar?

I might do this sort of thing with a total of four mikes on everything.
Maybe even two, depending on the guitar amps.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"Scott Dorsey" <kludge@panix.com> wrote in message
news:dbu714$eni$1@panix2.panix.com...
> Dylan <dylan@rattlebox.plus.com> wrote:
> >
> >I'm recording a band and want to record the rhythm section live... that's
7
> >inputs for drums, 1 for bass and 4 for 2 guitars.
>
> Why seven inputs for drums?
>
> Why two mikes on each guitar?
>

Snare, Kick, Stereo Toms, Stereo overheads & hi hats. Guitars are 1 mic & DI
(Line 6 amps)

This is how I've always recorded... thought it was pretty standard

Dylan

Reply to dylan

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:50:37 +0100, "Dylan" <dylan@rattlebox.plus.com>
wrote:

>Snare, Kick, Stereo Toms, Stereo overheads & hi hats. Guitars are 1 mic & DI
>(Line 6 amps)
>
>This is how I've always recorded... thought it was pretty standard

It's pretty standard. But not necessarily for any very good reason.

If you multi-mic a drum kit you open a can of worms of leakage and
phase problems. To cure that, you start gating. Then the close-miced
snare sounds lifeless, so you add artificial reverb. Etc etc. You
cause yourself problems which have to be fixed.


Isn't there a place near the drums where they sound good? Why not a
stereo pair there? Plus, perhaps, a spot mic on the bass drum, if a
strong thud is central to the style of music.

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > audio interface
Go to:

There are 1105 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them