I bought a mp3 player but the headphones aren't that great. They
easily slip out of my years. The sound quality is not great either.
I could not find very many reviews for low end headphones. I have
seen many different styles in the store but not sure which ones would
work best for me, since they don't have any on display that I could
actually try. I don't like the idea of buying different pairs trying
it at home and returning it if I don't like it. any recommendations
for
1) sound quality
2) phone types (curved behind the ears style, earbuds, etc)
labicff@yahoo.com wrote:
> I bought a mp3 player but the headphones aren't that great. They
> easily slip out of my years. The sound quality is not great either.
> I could not find very many reviews for low end headphones. I have
> seen many different styles in the store but not sure which ones would
> work best for me, since they don't have any on display that I could
> actually try. I don't like the idea of buying different pairs trying
> it at home and returning it if I don't like it. any recommendations
> for
> 1) sound quality
> 2) phone types (curved behind the ears style, earbuds, etc)
>
>
> tx
>
>
> lbbss
>
Sennheiser PX100 are excellent for about $30.
In article <1124463545.678690.258370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
<labicff@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I bought a mp3 player but the headphones aren't that great. They
>easily slip out of my years. The sound quality is not great either.
>I could not find very many reviews for low end headphones. I have
>seen many different styles in the store but not sure which ones would
>work best for me, since they don't have any on display that I could
>actually try. I don't like the idea of buying different pairs trying
>it at home and returning it if I don't like it. any recommendations
>for
>1) sound quality
>2) phone types (curved behind the ears style, earbuds, etc)
I think you are very much in the wrong newsgroup.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
In article <1124463545.678690.258370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> labicff@yahoo.com writes:
> I could not find very many reviews for low end headphones. I have
> seen many different styles in the store but not sure which ones would
> work best for me, since they don't have any on display that I could
> actually try. I don't like the idea of buying different pairs trying
> it at home and returning it if I don't like it.
I buy and return at least as much as I buy and keep, and for exactly
this reason - the stores don't provide a way to evaluate products that
they sell. Just do it. It's the only way you'll know that you're
satisfied.
However, one of the things that makes headphones "low end" is the
design of the headband and cushions. It doesn't seem like there's much
to it, but it makes all the difference in comfort, fit, and to a
certain extent, the sound. And there are a bunch of stoopid designs
out there that someone seems to think are a good idea. I got a set
with my Jukebox 3 that seem to be designed so that the band goes
across the back of your head, of all things!
Most of us in this newsgroup are looking for "monitor quality"
headphones and about as "low end" as we get are the ones that we buy
for studio musicians who want the sound level so loud that we don't
want to risk blowing good headphones.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
On 19 Aug 2005 15:35:37 -0400, mrivers@d-and-d.com (Mike Rivers)
wrote:
>Most of us in this newsgroup are looking for "monitor quality"
>headphones and about as "low end" as we get are the ones that we buy
>for studio musicians who want the sound level so loud that we don't
>want to risk blowing good headphones.
.. . . which is why I have eight pairs of Sony MDR-150s ($20.98 at Best
Buy)
Good, not great sound, and you can crank them up very, very loud.
labicff@yahoo.com wrote:
> I bought a mp3 player but the headphones aren't that great. They
> easily slip out of my years. The sound quality is not great either.
> I could not find very many reviews for low end headphones. I have
> seen many different styles in the store but not sure which ones would
> work best for me, since they don't have any on display that I could
> actually try. I don't like the idea of buying different pairs trying
> it at home and returning it if I don't like it. any recommendations
> for
> 1) sound quality
> 2) phone types (curved behind the ears style, earbuds, etc)
>
>
> tx
>
>
> lbbss
>
Sennhieser PX-100s and/or Koss Portapros.
I've owned both.
The Sennheisers excel at having extreme detail.
Koss Portapros excel at having the best frequency balance with a nice
bass boost, not too excessive or tiring.
>> I bought a mp3 player but the headphones aren't that great. They
>> easily slip out of my years. The sound quality is not great either.
>> I could not find very many reviews for low end headphones. I have
>> seen many different styles in the store but not sure which ones would
>> work best for me, since they don't have any on display that I could
>> actually try. I don't like the idea of buying different pairs trying
>> it at home and returning it if I don't like it. any recommendations
>> for
>> 1) sound quality
>> 2) phone types (curved behind the ears style, earbuds, etc)
Koss KTX-Pro1. Sound quality is pretty darned good for a low cost
headphone: $19.95
Radio Shack sells a version for $40 that they put on sale for $20.
moskowit@panix.com (Len Moskowitz) wrote in newsg6q1f$790$1
@reader1.panix.com:
>
> Blind Hog <blind_hog@acorn.com> wrote:
>
>>> Koss KTX-Pro1. Sound quality is pretty darned good for a low cost
>>> headphone: $19.95
>>
>>I find those to have very little HF.
>
> Had your hearing tested lately? Clear the wax out regularly?
OK, let me try again. I find them to have little HF compared to Koss Pro
4AA, my $10 Panasonic RP-HT21's, and my Event and Altec monitors. I don't
hear the bow strokes of a violin, the sheen of a trumpet, or the sizzle of
a cymbal. I'd estimate about 6 dB down by 8K. Perhaps I got a bad set.
>> Had your hearing tested lately? Clear the wax out regularly?
>
>OK, let me try again. I find them to have little HF compared to Koss Pro
>4AA, my $10 Panasonic RP-HT21's, and my Event and Altec monitors. I don't
>hear the bow strokes of a violin, the sheen of a trumpet, or the sizzle of
>a cymbal. I'd estimate about 6 dB down by 8K. Perhaps I got a bad
>set.
Perhaps so. IMO, compared to the Grado HP-1000s and SR-1s I use as
references, the little Koss-es don't seem to be lacking in high end.
Pretty smooth for a low-cost headphone.
"david morley" <david.morley@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:3ot6p4F7mlbmU1@individual.net...
> Sennheiser PX100 are pretty decent.
But they're not $20 headphones.
I haven't heard all the inexpensive cans on the market, but the PX100s,
which sell for $30 to $40, seem to be the cheapest headphones that are
likely to give any lasting satisfaction. And I really like the "eyeglass"
storage case.
It's not a good idea to buy something inexpensive you're going to outgrow.
>"david morley" <david.morley@gmx.net> wrote in message
>news:3ot6p4F7mlbmU1@individual.net...
>
>
>
>>Sennheiser PX100 are pretty decent.
>>
>>
>
>But they're not $20 headphones.
>
>I haven't heard all the inexpensive cans on the market, but the PX100s,
>which sell for $30 to $40, seem to be the cheapest headphones that are
>likely to give any lasting satisfaction. And I really like the "eyeglass"
>storage case.
>
>It's not a good idea to buy something inexpensive you're going to outgrow.
>
>
>
>
True. $30 or so.
Worth the extra though and as you say, the case is excellent.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.