RME 9652 & Lynx Two A...latency query.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Anybody know or can you even know without knowing the exact system specs
which will have lower input & output latency ....A RME 9652 or Lynx Two A?

--
http://tinyurl.com/dvgrd

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1124719922k@trad...
>
> In article <acjOe.45647$rp.24595@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
acmost@bellsouth.not writes:
>
> > Anybody know or can you even know without knowing the exact system
specs
> > which will have lower input & output latency ....A RME 9652 or Lynx Two
A?
>
> There are no (reliable) specifications on latency. You just have to
> try it. I'd say it would be a tossup, and that either could be
> adjusted low enough so that either you wouldn't have a problem or
> you'd have a problem you can't get rid of.
>
> Understand that there are many kinds of latency - A/D, D/A, D/D, MIDI-
> in-to-Audio-out, and the driver and your computer contribute to the
> time delay. About the only (sometimes published) numbers that you can
> compare is the minimum number of samples that you can buffer, but your
> system may not work well with that setting.
>
> I'm a Lynx fan, mostly because their stuff sounds good (I have an L22)
> and they're just so darn nice to me. But RME makes good hardware and
> drivers too, and I really think it comes down to features and your
> confidence in the company.
>
> --
> I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
> However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
> lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
> you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
> and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo


Thats all too logical. thanks for the reply!

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"a.m." <acmost@bellsouth.not> wrote in message
news:acjOe.45647$rp.24595@bignews1.bellsouth.net
> Anybody know or can you even know without knowing the
> exact system specs which will have lower input & output
> latency ....A RME 9652 or Lynx Two A?

The Lynx interfaces have had relatively low latency because
they weren't DSP-based, but rather were random logic-based.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <1124756793.087478.97080@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> annonn@juno.com writes:

> The RME being digital I/O only doesn't have
> onboard converters. This leads me to believe
> that it would have a lower latency on it's own
> but when combined with (whatever) converters
> may have a greater latency when compared to the
> Lynx as an A/D-D/A.

Or, conversely, they may have about the same latency when using the
digital I/O of the Lynx.

--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo